Section of Taxation Publications
The State and Local Tax Lawyer, Vol. 5, 2000

VOL. 5, 2000
Abstract | Contents | SALTL Home
 
Jurisdictional Limitations on State Claims to Abandoned Property
John A. Biek

Notes

1 For a compilation of the various state abandoned property statutes, see David J. Epstein, Unclaimed Property Law and Reporting Forms, Volumes 2, 2A and 2B (Matthew Bender 1999) (hereinafter “Epstein”).

2 See id. § 1.02.

3 379 U.S. 674, 681 (1965).

4 41 U.S. 428, 444 (1951) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting).

5 504 U.S. 298 (1992). For a discussion of Quill, see infra at p.18.

6 Some state court decisions suggest that even the holder’s state of corporate domicile cannot claim the property under these circumstances. See Nellius v. Tampax, Inc., 394 A.2d 233 (Del. Chanc. 1978); New Jersey v. Amsted Industries, 226 A.2d 715, 717-18 (N.J. 1967).

BACK TO TOP


Published by
Section of Taxation, American Bar Association
With the Assistance of
Georgetown University Law Center

 

You may order copies of The State and Local Tax Lawyer through our online Publications Catalog.