|
Specific Comments on the Proposed
Section 121 Regulations
(Reg-105235-99; October 10, 2000)
May 1, 2001
III. Form of Ownership of a Principal Residence
Background
Section 121 applies to a taxpayer who has owned and used a home. In most instances, this
provision does not raise any issues because an individual directly owns and uses the home.
However, some individuals have placed their residences into trusts or other entities and
rulings have been issued in the past as to how former Sections 121 and 1034 applied to
such ownership.7
The Section 121 proposed regulations were issued along with Prop. Reg.
§1.1398-3 to state officially the Services position as to the application of
Section 121 for residences held by a bankruptcy estate in response to differing court
opinions. It states that the bankruptcy estate of an individual succeeds to and takes into
account the individual Section 121 exclusion if the individual satisfies the requirements
of Section 121(a). The proposed regulations do not address other forms of ownership.
Comments
For years, individuals, for varying reasons, have sometimes opted to hold their principal
residence in some type of trust. Court cases and private letter rulings have been issued
to address the application of former Section 121 and both former and present Section 121
to these forms of ownership. However, guidance is incomplete.
Recommendation: The Section 121 regulations should be expanded to
provide guidance on the types of ownership of a residence that will and will not qualify
the owner for the Section 121 exclusion. Given the variety of forms of ownership that may
be used (revocable trusts, irrevocable trusts, partnerships, etc.), it would be most
useful for the Service to provide a list of factors that must exist in order for the
beneficial owner to be able to use the Section 121 gain exclusion.
|
7 A settlor/beneficiary of a
grantor trust that held title to the beneficiary's residence was entitled to apply Section
121. Rev. Rul. 85-45, 1985-1 C.B. 1983, and Rev. Rul. 66-159, 1966-1 C.B. 162. See also
PLR 8007050 (November 23, 1979). A partner in an investment partnership who used
partnership property as a residence was not eligible for the former Section 121 exclusion.
Allied Marine Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner, 73 TCM 2124, 2130-2131 (1997). |
|
|