|
Comments Concerning Proposed
Regulation on Qualified Transportation
Fringe Benefits under Internal Revenue Code Section 132(F)
II. The Readily Available Standard for Cash
Reimbursements
-
Multi-Locational Employer Safe Harbor
Multi-locational employers will be
particularly reluctant to offer qualified mass transit programs since substantial systems
modifications may be required based solely upon price changes made by numerous unrelated
vendors. Therefore, we recommend that a second safe harbor be considered that would ease
the administrative burden for all employers with employees in more than one location.
Under this safe harbor, after applying the 1 percent safe harbor rule to each location
where the program is offered, if the employer would not be required to distribute vouchers
to a significant number of its employees who participate in the mass transit program, then
no location would be required to distribute vouchers. This safe harbor refines the 1
percent safe harbor by allowing an employer with multiple business locations to provide
cash reimbursements in all locations if a significant percentage of its workforce
participates in the mass transit program in any area where the average administrative
costs that would be incurred by the employer for vouchers are more than 1 percent of the
average monthly value of the vouchers for the system.
This new safe harbor would preserve the benefit for employees of multi-locational
employers by protecting those programs from sudden price changes by mass transit vendors
and changes in elections by employees. In addition, we believe that this would help to
realign the qualified transportation regulation with Congresss intent to provide an
incentive to employees to use mass transit. Specifically, employers with multiple
locations would want to raise awareness of and participation in their mass transit
programs so that their programs would meet the "significant number of
participants" standard.
|