Section of Taxation
Submission to the Executive Branch

Home | Contents | Introduction | Conclusion

Comments Concerning Temporary and Proposed Regulations
Under Section 4958 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

April 10, 2001

  1. Prohibited Transaction Excise Taxes

    Background: The Department has requested comments on possible areas of coordination with the IRS that would facilitate voluntary correction of fiduciary breaches. One area in which coordination would be appropriate is that of prohibited transaction excise taxes under section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). The first-tier excise tax in section 4975(a), imposed on the disqualified person with respect to the prohibited transaction, is equal to 15% of the amount involved in the transaction for each year until the transaction is corrected. The excise tax is administered by the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS").

    The form of the no action letter to be issued under the Program, in Appendix A to the Program document, states that prohibited transaction matters will be referred to the IRS. The accompanying release further states that full correction under the Program will not preclude the IRS from exercising any rights it may have with respect to the transaction. Consequently, it appears that the disclosure of any prohibited transaction in a Program application will result in the IRS imposing prohibited transaction excise taxes on the parties who engaged in the transaction with the plan.

    Comment: The fact that an application to correct a prohibited transaction will automatically lead to excise tax liability will discourage potential applicants from using the Program.

    Recommendation: We urge the Department to work with the IRS to remove this impediment to using the Program. The simplest solution would be for the IRS to agree to abate or otherwise waive excise taxes for applicants who submit an application that is accepted under the Program, perhaps subject to a requirement that the application be filed within a certain period of the original transaction.

    If the statutory authority for such a waiver is lacking, another approach would be to issue a class exemption modeled on PTE 96-63, the class exemption that was part of the "pension payback" program and served as a precursor to the Program. PTE 96-63 provided relief from all of the prohibited transaction provisions of section 406 of ERISA and section 4975 of the Code, except section 406(b)(3) and section 4975(c)(1)(F). Similarly, a class exemption could provide the same section 406 and section 4975 relief for transactions covered by applications submitted and accepted under the Program.

Home | Contents | Introduction | Conclusion