Comments on IRS Announcement 2000-84 on the
Need for Guidance
Clarifying the Application of Internal Revenue Code Provisions
to Use of the Internet by Exempt Organizations
February 2001
Contents | I | II | III | IV | V | VI
I. Overview
We welcome the opportunity to respond to the request for comments in IRS Announcement
2000-84, 2000-42 I.R.B. 385 (the "Announcement"), regarding the need for
guidance clarifying the application of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") to
use of the Internet by exempt organizations.
To our knowledge, the Announcement is unique in its request for comments regarding the
tax laws overall application to a particular technological medium, rather than the
application of one or a few Code sections. Given the wide scope of the request, we have
concluded that before addressing the specific areas in which the Internal Revenue Service
("IRS") has asked for comments, it would be helpful to identify the range of
guidance levels that may be appropriate and to articulate certain broad principles that
inform our approach in all areas.
With respect to the level of guidance needed, the threshold question is whether the IRS
should issue any guidance at this time. In our view, there are some areas in which
guidance would be helpful. The challenge of providing guidance is complicated by the fact
that the technology, capabilities and range of uses of the Internet are expanding at
breathtaking speed. Any guidance must recognize those dynamics. Accordingly, we have
classified potential guidance topics into the following categories, identified below in
the discussion of each topic:
Category One (1): areas where no guidance is necessary
because guidance exists under current law that can be generally applied in the Internet
context;
Category Two (2): areas where guidance can and should be
provided at this time regarding the manner in which current law applies in the Internet
context;
Category Three (3): areas where some guidance would be
helpful, such as through the development of safe harbors, but where definitive guidance is
not currently possible or advisable given the rapidly changing technology and uses of the
Internet; and
Category Four (4): areas in which the use of the Internet
is incidental to larger substantive issues, the substantive issues are themselves in need
of administrative interpretation, and the specific circumstances of the use of the
Internet should be addressed only as part of more comprehensive guidance on the underlying
substantive issues.
In particular, we recommend that the IRS consider issuing formal guidance on which
organizations may rely in the areas of (1) lobbying and political activities and
(2) unrelated business income tax ("UBIT") issues involving the Internet.
In addition, we recommend that the IRS provide guidance regarding disclosure of
nondeductible contributions and substantiation of charitable contributions through the
Internet, either by means of a publication on which organizations may rely or through
coordination with Treasury to amend the applicable regulations. For our specific
recommendations regarding each of the IRSs questions, please refer to the
"Recommendations" sections under each topic.
The IRS has articulated informally that an exempt organizations use of the
Internet to accomplish a particular task does not change the way in which the tax laws
apply to that task. That concept is helpful in contexts where an exempt
organizations activities that involve the Internet are largely indistinguishable
from its activities through other media. In some contexts, however, the Internets
singular attributes present mechanisms for accomplishing tasks that are not contemplated
under existing law. In those contexts, it may be necessary to develop rules that apply
uniquely to Internet use.
Contents | I | II | III | IV | V | VI |