Section of Taxation
Submission to the Internal Revenue Service

Industry Issue Resolution Pilot Program under Notice 2000-65
Financial Services Issues

Contents | Introduction | I | II | III

Introduction

This report is in response to Notice 2000-651 inviting interested parties to suggest issues for the Industry Issue Resolution Pilot Program. As indicated in the Notice, the Industry Issue Resolution Pilot Program is intended to provide guidance to resolve frequently disputed tax issues that are common to a significant number of large or mid-sized businesses. The members of the Committee on Banking and Savings Institutions who have contributed to this letter are experienced tax practitioners with substantial background in working with financial services industry clients on tax controversies.

We welcome the opportunity afforded by the Notice and more especially the initiative with respect to industry issue resolution. It is clear to us that IRS audits of banks and other financial institutions are burdened by disputes over several timing issues that consume too many resources of both Service and taxpayers. Banks face examination disputes over the tax treatment of problem loans, whether in the form of a deduction for worthlessness of bad debts under IRC section 166 or for the accrual of interest income on non-performing loans. The treatment of problem loans is an issue that is common to all large and mid-sized banks and frequently the subject of dispute between the Service and bank taxpayers. The tax treatment of bad debts and non-accruals is highly dependent on facts, and the range of fact situations is endless. Moreover, the issues relate simply to the timing of deductions, so the cost of the many tax controversies should be weighed against just the interest on the disputed amount, not the tax amount at issue in any given year. Finally, it should be observed that Congress and Treasury have recognized in the past that the tax issues related to problem loans need a more efficient method of resolution for bank taxpayers, because of the sheer volume of bank lending and the prospect for unnecessary factual disputes between bank taxpayers and the Service.2

Contents | Introduction | I | II | III