You currently do not have JavaScript enabled in your web browser.
The ABA website relies on JavaScript for display purposes.
To fully experience the ABA site, please enable javascript.
ABA Section of Real Property, Probate and Trust Law | RPPT

Publications
Section of Real Property, Probate, and Trust Law

E-DIRT
Fall 2000
(Volume I, Issue 4)

Newsletter of the Real Property Probate and Trust Law Section
of the American Bar Association

Back to Table of Contents

Installment Sales – New Prohibitions and Relief
by
Steven B. Gorin, Esq.*

Thompson Coburn LLP

One Firstar Plaza
Suite 3300
St. Louis, Missouri 63101-1693
Telephone: 314-552-6151
Facsimile: 314-552-7151

sgorin@thompsoncoburn.com

Subject to a number of exceptions and restrictions, the "installment method" of recognizing gain for tax purposes (as described at I. R. C. § 453) permits a taxpayer to defer paying capital gains tax on an "installment sale" (also described at I. R. C. § 453). Using the installment method, a taxpayer given a promissory note in exchange for the sale of assets, reports a portion of the gain based on the portion of sales proceeds collected. However, for sales occurring on or after December 17, 1999, new I. R. C. § 453(a)(2) provides that a taxpayer using the accrual method of tax accounting for income tax purposes cannot use the installment method.

IRS Notice 2000-26, <http://ftp.fedworld.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb00-17.pdf>, provides guidance in applying new § 453(a)(2). According to this Rule, even if an S corporation uses the accrual method of accounting for income tax purposes, its shareholders using the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting for income tax purposes (the "cash method"), may sell stock in the S corporation using the installment method.

Small businesses seeking relief from the operation of § 453 may wish to take advantage of some creative relief recently afforded by the IRS. IRS Revenue Procedure 2000-22 <http://ftp.fedworld.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb00-20.pdf>, allows businesses with no more than $1 million in average annual receipts to switch to the cash method of accounting. This opportunity to switch is available whether or not a taxpayer wants to do an installment sale-----a favorable development, since the cash method of accounting is generally more favorable to the taxpayer than is the accrual method due to stringent timing limitations for taking deductions under the tax laws. The operation of the limitations on the accrual method generally results in deductions being deferred for years, with the net effect that some deductions may not be available until the taxpayer terminates business. Meanwhile, although ability to take deductions may be deferred applying the accrual method, income must be recognized as soon as it is billed. These rules do not apply to taxpayers who use the cash method.

 

*Steven B. Gorin is a partner of Thompson Coburn LLP in St. Louis, Missouri and is a member of the Firm’s Trust and Estate Planning Practice Group. Prior to practicing law, Mr. Gorin was a partner in a local CPA firm. Mr. Gorin has substantial experience in organizational, tax and succession planning for privately held business, insurance and charitable giving, Mr. Gorin’s particular specialty is use of innovative strategies (including limited partnerships) to obtain valuation discounts, to defer or avoid capital gains tax on the sale of highly appreciated assets, and to transfer rapidly growing assets at minimal tax cost. For further information regarding Thompson Coburn LLP or Mr. Gorin, visit http://www.thompsoncoburn.com.

The views expressed herein are those of the author only, and constitute neither the opinion of Thompson Coburn LLP nor necessarily the position of Thompson Coburn LLP. The options discussed herein are not appropriate in every situation, as each client’s situation is unique. The tax analysis presented herein is not intended to be thorough coverage but merely an attempt to raise some of the issues that apply in many situations. The reader should not rely on this outline but rather should do thorough independent research if the reader is a qualified professional, otherwise the reader should consult a qualified professional.

back to top

 

E-DIRT
Fall 2000

(Volume 1, Issue 4)
Newsletter of the Real Property Probate and Trust Law Section
of the American Bar Association
Back to Table of Contents