Case Highlights 2005-2006 Term
Each summer, Preview highlights the key rulings from every Supreme Court decision handed down throughout the term. These case highlights are arranged both by case name and topical area and include the vote breakdown and an excerpt from the majority or plurality opinion. (In the interests of readability, most citations and internal quotes are omitted from these opinion excerpts.)
Case Name
Anza, et al. v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.
Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp.
Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services v. Ahlborn
rlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, et al.
Beard v. Banks
Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al.
Brown v. Sanders
Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna et al.
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
Central Virginia Community College, et al. v. Katz
Clark v. Arizona
DaimlerChrysler Corp., et al. v. Cuno, et al.
Davis v. Washington
Day v. McDonough (formerly Day v. Crosby)
Dixon v. United States
Dolan v. United States Postal Service et al.
Domino's Pizza Inc, et al. v. McDonald
eBay Inc. v. MercExchange L.L.C.
Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeigh
Evans v. Chavis
Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales
Garcetti, et al. v. Ceballos
Georgia v. Randolph
Gonzales v. Oregon et al.
Gonzales et al. v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Unias Do Vegetal et al.
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Hartman et al. v. Moore
Hill v. McDonough, et al.
Holmes v. South Carolina
House v. Bell
Howard Delivery Service, Inc. et al. v. Zurich American Insurance Co.
Hudson v. Michigan
IBP Inc. v. Alvarez and Tum v. Barber Foods, Inc.
Illinois Tool Works Inc., et al v. Independent Ink, Inc.
Jones v. Flowers et al.
Kansas v. Marsh
Kircher et al. v. Putnam Funds Trust, et al.
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Metabo-Lite Laboratories Inc. et al.
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
Lincoln Property Co. et al. v. Roche et ux.
Lockhart v. United States et al.
Marshall v. Marshall
Martin et ux v. Franklin Capital Corp.
Maryland v. Blake
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit
Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams, et al.
Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Chatham County, Georgia
Oregon v. Guzek
Randall v. Sorrell
Rapanos v. United States
Rice et al. v. Collins
Rumsfeld et al. v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights Inc. et al.
Samson v. California
Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
Schaffer v. Weast
Scheidler et al. v. National Organization for Women Inc. et al. and
Operation Rescue v. National Organization for Women, Inc. et al.
S.D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection, et al.
Sereboff et ux. v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.
Texaco Inc. v. Dagher et al. and
Shell Oil Co. v. Dagher et al.
United States v. Georgia et al.
United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez
United States v. Grubbs
United States v. Olson et al.
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.
Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc.
Wachovia Bank v. Schmidt, et al.
Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation
Washington v. Recuenco
Whitman v. Department of Transportation et al.
Will et al. v. Hallock et al.
Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission
Woodford et al. v. Ngo
Zedner v. United States
