You currently do not have JavaScript enabled in your web browser.
The ABA website relies on JavaScript for display purposes.
To fully experience the ABA site, please enable javascript.
ABA Division for Public Education: 2003 National Online Youth Summit: Learning Links & Readings




 

Spring 2003: "Access Denied: Should Youth Access to the Internet be Restricted?"

Summit Menu:

Learning Links and Readings

Book Censorship | Child Development | First Amendment | The Internet
Legal Background | Media Violence | Music | Obscenity
Public Opinion | Public Policy | Television | Video Games | Youth Violence


Book Censorship

“Battling Over What Goes On Kids' Library Shelves,” -- By Christy Mumford Jerding. From The Freedom Forum Online

“Censorship and Challenge.” -- One perspective from the American Library Association.

“Children's Books Stir Up Tempest in South Carolina” -- (10/14/1999) By The Associated Press. The state board said it was up to local school boards to decide if the books were appropriate, but agreed to review them. "Censorship is an ugly word, but it is not as ugly as what I've heard this morning,"

“Disenchanted by Harry Potter ” -- November 24, 1999. From the Concerned Women for America - a conservative public interest group.

“Don't Cave In to the Book Banners” -- by Joan E. Bertin, from the National Coalition Against Censorship web page.
The book in question is Robert Lipsyte's One Fat Summer.

“Huntsville, Ala., School Board Member Wants Two Books Banned” -- By The Associated Press
James Dawson calls Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry and Is He A Girl? 'trashy trash,' asks that they be removed from elementary school libraries.

“Is Harry Potter Evil?” By Judy Blume. -- From the National Coalition Against Censorship web page

Free Expression Policy Project

Child Development

Normal Adolescent Development, Facts for Families. -- From the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Facts for Families Index.

Understanding the Impact of Media on Children and Teens. -- From the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Back to top

First Amendment

“Anti-Pornography Law Struck Down in a Yale Classroom,” (June 4, 1999) by Carl S. Kaplan, New York Times Cyber Law Journal.

Constitutional Problems with the Communications Decency Amendment: A Legislative Analysis. -- By the Electronic Frontier Foundation, June 16, 1995.

"Does the Children's Internet Protection Act Induce Public Libraries to Violate the First Amendment?" -- By Susanna F. Fischer, Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases.

Freedom of Expression: The Philosophical Basis. -- From FindLaw Annotations to Constitution of U.S.

The First Amendment at the Beginning of a New Millennium. -- From the Freedom Forum.

The FCC and Freedom of Speech, Publication 75. -- From the Federal Communications Commission Mass Media Bureau

Government Restraint of Content of Expression. -- From FindLaw Annotations to Constitution of U.S.

Mock Supreme Court Opinion of the Washington College of Law, American University, Law in the Information Society Class in Reno v. ACLU (Communications Decency Act).

Regulation of Indecent Speech -- Exploring Constitutional Conflicts Web Site from the University of Missouri-Kansas City Law School. Doug Linder, Professor of Law.

Free Expression Policy Project

Back to top

The Internet

“ACLU, Justice Department Battle Again Over Net Censorship Law,” -- (11/20/99) by David Hudson, First Amendment Center. From the Freedom Forum.

ACLU page on CIPA/American Library Association Case.

Berkman Center for Internet & Society -- From Harvard Law School.

Cato Handbook for Congress: Freedom on the Internet and Other Computer Networks

"Censoring Cyberspace: Library Internet Filtering," -- Justice Talking show on CIPA/Internet filtering.

CHILLING THE INTERNET? Lessons from FCC Regulation of Radio Broadcasting -- Cato Policy Analysis No. 270 March 19, 1997 CHILLING THE INTERNET? Lessons from FCC Regulation of Radio Broadcasting by Thomas W. Hazlett and David W. Sosa

Communications Decency Act Archives. -- From the Center for Democracy and Technology. Includes links to the text of the bill, amendments, analysis, statements from congressional members about the bill, and links to position papers of interest groups that favored the bill.

“Consumer Protection is Latest Excuse to Regulate the Net,” -- (12/1/99) by John Katz, from the First Amendment Center.

“FCC’s Critics Call For More Web Regulation,” -- (12/8/99) by the Associated Press. From the Freedom Forum.

"Internet Censorship: Law & Policy around the World," -- Report from Electronic Frontiers Australia.

“Libraries Struggle with Pressure to Filter Internet,” -- (12/10/99) by the Associated Press. From the Freedom Forum.

National Coalition for the Protection of Children and Families

“States Just Won’t Give Up on Online Pornography Laws,” -- (Oct. 8, 1999) by Pamela Mendels, New York Times Cyber Law Journal.

“Predicting the Legal Internet Issues for 2000,” -- (Dec. 31, 1999) by Carl S. Kaplan, New York Times Cyber Law Journal.

“Radical Library Organization Pushes Unrestricted Access to Pornography,” -- American Family Association Journal, September 1999; Vol. 23, Issue 9.

“A Regretful Tone in Judge’s Decision on Internet Pornography,” -- (Feb. 5, 1999) by Carl S. Kaplan, New York Times Cyber Law Journal.

“Regulating Cyberspace Will Be Messy—But Fun,” -- by Ruth O’Brien, Media Studies Center, the Freedom Forum.

“State Internet Law Faces Different Constitutional Challenge,” -- (July 2, 1999) by Carl S. Kaplan, New York Times Cyber Law Journal.

SaferInternet.org -- European Union response to issues raised by presence of "harmful, racist, and illegal" content on Internet.

“Yale Law Professor is Main Architect of Global Filtering Plan,” -- ( Sept. 10, 1999) by Carl S. Kaplan, New York Times Cyber Law Journal.

Free Expression Policy Project

Back to top

Legal Background
Following are legal issues that are central to this summit.

  • Full text of the 1997 Supreme Court case, Reno v. ACLU, which invalidated the 1996 Communications Decency Act passed by Congress. [This is the leading Supreme Court case and relevant Congressional act on the subject of Freedom of Speech and the Internet.]
  • Butler v. Michigan, 1957, established that the state cannot reduce the adult reading public to reading only what is appropriate for children.
  • Roth v. U.S., 1957, holding that obscene speech is not protected by the First Amendment
  • Ginsberg v. New York, 1968, reaffirmed the principal that the state has an interest in preventing the distribution to minors of materials harmful to them.
  • Miller v. California, 1973, holding that the definition of obscenity in individual cases is to be determined by referring to "contemporary community standards," not national standards
  • FCC v. Pacifica, 1978, established that in the interest of public welfare, broadcast speech that is indecent may be regulated.
  • Barnes v. Glen Theatre, 1991, holding that a state law banning total nudity in public places does not violate the First Amendment because it is an appropriate exercise of the state's police power
  • Ashcroft v. ACLU, 2002, returned to the Third Circuit Court for futher review.

Notable First Amendment Cases

For general legal sites, visit

Back to top

Media Violence (General)

"FTC Report: Entertainment Industry Markets Violent Material to Youth" -- By The Associated Press. From the Freedom Forum.

"Pinning a Label on Violence in Media" -- By Paul McMasters. From the Freedom Forum.

Free Expression Policy Project

Back to top

Music

“Stopping the Music Won't Stop the Violence,” -- From the Freedom Forum.

The Influence of Music and Rock Videos. Facts For Families. -- From American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Facts for Families Index.

Impact of Music Lyrics and Music Videos on Children and Youth Policy Statement (RE9648). -- From the American Academy of Pediatrics.

"Music Censorship: Elvis to Ice-T," -- By Eric Nuzum. Link from the Internet Wayback Machine

Eric Nuzum's Web Site

Youth and Violent Music -- From Mediascope.

Back to top

Obscenity

FCC Consumer Facts: Obscene and Indecent Broadcasts. -- From the Federal Communications Commission Web site.

“Obscenity” -- A legal discussion from FindLaw Annotations to the U.S. Constitution

Free Expression Policy Project

Back to top

Public Opinion

“Parents Deeply Torn Over Kids, Internet,” -- (5/6/99) by the Associated Press. From the Freedom Forum.

State of the First Amendment: A Survey of Public Attitudes. -- By Paul McMasters, First Amendment Center.

Back to top

Public Policy

Congressional Statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics Before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee on the Television Ratings System -- (Feb. 27, 1997).

Federal Communications Commission V-Chip Home Page

Government Regulation of Children’s Television, Issue Brief. -- From Mediascope.

Media Ratings: At Home and Around the World, Issue Briefs. -- From Mediascope.

The Public and Broadcasting (June 1999). -- From the Mass Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission. A brief non-technical overview of the FCC's regulation of broadcast radio and television.

Studies Find Public Policies for Children and Teenagers Not Very Effective: D.A.R.E., Sex Education and TV Content Legislation Fall Short of Their Intended Goals. -- (August 1997), Press Release from the American Psychological Association.

Television Blocking Technologies. -- From Mediascope.

Free Expression Policy Project

Back to top

Television

Children and the Media -- From Arizona State University Department of Family and Human Development.

Children, Unlike Adults, Recall More of What They See on Television That What They Read, Study Finds. -- (Feb. 26, 1997) Press Release from the American Psychological Association.

Children and Watching T.V. Facts for Families. -- From American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Facts for Families Index.

How Children Process Television, Issue Brief. -- From Mediascope, a national nonprofit research and policy organization that provides tools to the creative community to be more socially responsible.

National Television Violence Study, Issue Brief. -- From study administered by Mediascope and conducted by the Universities of California at Santa Barbara; North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Texas at Austin, and Wisconsin at Madison.

NVTS (National Television Violence Study): Content Analysis, Issue Brief. -- From study administered by Mediascope and conducted by the Universities of California at Santa Barbara; North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Texas at Austin, and Wisconsin at Madison.

Free Expression Policy Project

Back to top

Video Games

Children and Video Games -- From Arizona State University Department of Family and Human Development.

"Covering New Culture: Get into the Game," -- By Jon Katz. From the Freedom Forum.

"The Link Between Video Games and Violence," -- By TechTV News staff. From TechTV.

"Video Games and Aggressive Thoughts, Feelings, and Behavior in the Laboratory and in Life," -- By Craig A. Anderson and Karen E. Dill. From the APA Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

"Video Games and Children," -- By Bernard Cesarone. From ERIC.

Free Expression Policy Project

Back to top

Youth Violence

Children and School Violence -- From Arizona State University Department of Family and Human Development.

Theories on Causation of Youth Violence -- From the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control.

Understanding Violent Behavior in Children & Adolescents, Facts for Families. -- From the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Facts for Families Index.

Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General -- From the Surgeon General.

Youth Violence in the United States Fact Sheet.
-- From the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control.

Free Expression Policy Project

Back to top