
Letters to the 107th Congress
May 7, 2002
The Honorable Robert Barr
Chairman
Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law
Committee on the Judiciary
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
On behalf of the American Bar Association ("ABA") and its more
than 400,000 members throughout the country, I write to express our concerns
regarding H.R. 4561, the "Federal Agency Protection of Privacy Act."
I ask that this letter and attachment be included in the record of the hearing
that was held on May 1, 2002, regarding this legislation.
H.R. 4561 would require federal agencies to formally consider the impact
that new regulations will have on the privacy of individuals. Among other
things, the bill would: (1) require agencies to include an initial privacy
impact analysis with proposed regulations; (2) require agencies, after an
opportunity for public comment, to include a final privacy impact analysis
that describes the steps that were taken to minimize the significant privacy
impact of proposed regulations and that justifies the alternative chosen by
the agency with respect to privacy; (3) permit judicial review of the adequacy
of an agency’s final privacy impact analysis; and (4) require agencies to
periodically review rules that have either a significant privacy impact on
individuals or a privacy impact on a significant number of individuals.
The ABA certainly agrees that the American public should be protected from
unjustified or unintended invasions of privacy by the federal government
through legislative enactments, executive orders, regulatory action and other
appropriate measures. While we applaud the purpose of this bill, we are
writing to express our opposition to H.R. 4561 because we do not believe that
the need for rulemaking privacy impact analyses has been demonstrated or that
imposing such a requirement would, on balance, prove useful in protecting
privacy rights.
In February 1992, the ABA House of Delegates adopted a formal policy
position concerning rulemaking impact analyses, and attached for your
consideration is a copy of the ABA’s resolution and report on this issue.
(The resolution expresses the official policy of the Association; the
accompanying report is included for information purposes only.) In adopting
this policy, the ABA urged the President and Congress to: exercise restraint
in requiring rulemaking impact analyses; assess the usefulness of existing and
planned analyses; and ensure agencies' adherence to recommendations of the ABA
and the Administrative Conference of the United States regarding such impact
analyses requirements.
The ABA adopted this policy in an effort to address the virtual explosion
in analytical requirements that have been imposed on the rulemaking process in
recent years and in the belief that too many such requirements detract from
the seriousness with which any requirement is taken. In our view, before
establishing a new regulatory impact analysis, the
President and Congress should assess whether the proposed new analytical
requirement would benefit the public by improving the rulemaking process.
The ABA does not believe that a privacy impact analysis would meet this
test for several reasons. First, requiring an agency to undertake a privacy
impact analysis does nothing, in and of itself, to protect the public from
unjustified or unintended invasions of privacy by the federal government.
Second, a general requirement to conduct a privacy impact analysis would
appear to sweep within its ambit the overwhelming majority of rules that do
not have any impact on privacy. Examples of such rules include federal tire
safety standards, EPA rules establishing limits on toxic substances, FDA rules
for the approval of prescription drugs, and Commerce Department export control
regulations, to name just a few. Finally, and perhaps most important, there
does not appear to be a widespread or persistent pattern of agency regulations
unjustifiably or unintentionally invading privacy. Thus, a requirement for a
privacy impact analysis could result in make-work for most agencies with
little benefit to the rulemaking process or the public’s privacy.
Federal government action that inadvertently or unnecessarily invades
privacy should not be tolerated. However, the ABA is not convinced that
sweeping legislation like H.R. 4561 is the appropriate vehicle for addressing
this issue. We therefore urge you to move cautiously and engage in additional
evaluation and deliberation before taking any further action on this
legislation. We also stand ready to work with you to craft legislation
directed at specific, identified problems of the federal government
inappropriately violating the privacy of any individual.
Thank you for considering the views of the ABA on these important matters.
If you would like more information regarding the ABA’s positions on these
issues, please contact our legislative counsel for privacy issues, Ellen C.
McBarnette, at 202/662-1760 or our legislative counsel for administrative law
issues, Larson Frisby, at 202/662-1760.
Sincerely,
Robert D. Evans
Director, Governmental Affairs Office
attachment
cc: All members of the House Judiciary Committee
107th
Congress Letters Home
|
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
Governmental Affairs Office
740 Fifteenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
ph: 202-662-1760
fx: 202-662-1762
|