|
Originally published in Student
Lawyer magazine, April 2005 (Vol. 33, No. 8). All rights
reserved.
Opinion
Student depression becomes an issue of faculty concern
by Herbert N. Ramy
Law student stress and depression are problems that have become
national in scope. While students enter law school suffering from
clinical stress and depression at a rate that mirrors the national
average, this number skyrockets during the first year of law school.
Studies have shown that law students suffer from clinical stress
and depression at a rate that is three to four times higher than
the national average.
These same studies indicate that student stress rises steadily
through the third year of law school and then improves only moderately
after graduation. At this point, law students show signs of stress
that is twice the national average. Unfortunately, this sad story
continues after law school. Lawyers are more likely to suffer from
clinical depression, marital difficulties, and substance abuse than
are any other professionals.
At Suffolk University Law School, we have tried a number of things
to reach out to and educate our students on this topic. For example,
we have brought in counselors to speak to students during orientation.
While this was an effective way to introduce the class to the university
counseling center, the students did not tend to take the warning
seriously. It was simply too early in the year, and they had yet
to experience the rigors of law school life.
At other times, we have offered stress- reduction seminars during
the semester. Through evaluations, we found that attendees learned
quite a bit from these sessions. Most importantly, they learned
about the necessity of maintaining a healthy balance in life between
law school and everything else. Attendance at these sessions was,
however, quite small. Attendance never rose beyond 20 students,
which is disappointing when one considers that our first-year class
is more than 550 students strong.
Just recently, we decided to try a somewhat different tack. In
the past, we concentrated our efforts on reaching out to students.
This year, we offered a faculty colloquium at which we laid out
the problem of student stress and depression.
Our hope was to educate the faculty on the topic and to use their
influence to help us reach out to students. Our fear was that professors
would be unreceptive to the topic. We were concerned that many would
adopt the attitude that stress in law school is normal, and that
any attempt to deal with the issue would be tantamount to coddling
our students.
As for the presentation itself, we divided the material into four
sections. We started our presentation with the same statistics I
mentioned at the outset of this article. Then, we attempted to relate
these numbers to specific examples of students in distress at Suffolk
Law School. Next, we reviewed some of the common warning signs of
stress and depression. The final aspect of the presentation, our
recommendations, generated the most interest and largest number
of questions from attendees.
For the most part, recommendations revolved around the idea of
improved and increased communication between faculty and students.
For example, educators understand that students place an inordinate
amount of emphasis on comments made by their professors. Students
long to hear positive comments from their professors but are loathe
to hear the negative. We recommended that professors temper their
negative comments, not with false praise, but with additional information.
For example, an invitation to visit a professor during office hours
can indicate that someone in the law school truly cares about that
student’s performance. Similarly, a professor who notices
that a student has been absent for several days, or is falling asleep
in class, or suddenly seems lost and raises the issue with the student
is demonstrating concern for that student’s well-being. In
a large lecture hall setting, students value any hint of personalized
attention.
We next moved on to communication in the form of individualized
feedback. One of the most common complaints voiced by law students
is the lack of feedback they receive from their professors. The
problem is particularly acute in first-year classes where professors
assign grades based solely on a final examination, or possibly a
final and a midterm. At Suffolk, our current grading procedures
preclude professors from providing students with graded feedback
other than in the form of a midterm and final examination. We noted
that no professor should be compelled to provide graded feedback
throughout the semester, but that precluding a professor from doing
so seemed inconsistent with academic freedom.
Our final recommendation to the faculty involved student study
habits. Most professors agreed that students should spend approximately
three hours studying outside of class for every hour in class. At
Suffolk, where first-year, full-time students are enrolled in 15
credit hours of classes, this adds up to approximately 60 hours
a week devoted to law school. During weeks when important writing
assignments are due, this number may climb to 70 hours a week.
Some of the literature we reviewed in preparing the presentation
asked why law school should consume so much of a student’s
time. In presenting this issue to the faculty, we took a slightly
different tack, fearing that a discussion of fewer hours studying
would devolve into a discussion of changes to the curriculum. Instead,
we focused our attention on the idea of maintaining balance.
In the surveys they had completed for us, professors noted that
they had dealt with stress by engaging in activities unrelated to
law school. Common examples included getting physical exercise,
spending time with family and friends, reading for pleasure, and
going to movies. We suggested to the faculty that they dealt with
stress by maintaining balance in their lives, and that we had the
responsibility to recommend the same to our students. Too often,
we emphasize only the need for additional studies. We do so both
explicitly and implicitly when we relate stories about ourselves,
our successful careers, and how much time we spent studying. While
additional studying can be important, we should mention another
important ingredient to our success—time spent away from law
school.
The faculty’s response to the colloquium was a pleasant
surprise. The session was well enough attended that additional tables
and chairs had to be brought into the room. The faculty listened
attentively throughout the presentation, and no one suggested that
the issue was unworthy of further discussion.
When we presented the data we had gathered from the literature,
most faculty members were shocked at the prevalence of the problem
and even accepted some responsibility for helping to deal with it.
In fact, several faculty members suggested that the dean create
a committee whose sole responsibility would be to research the topic
further and make recommendations to the faculty on how to proceed.
Others asked if we would make a similar presentation to their classes
later in the semester.
In the days since the presentation, we have received many e-mails
from faculty thanking us for bringing the topic to their attention.
Our modest approach of simply informing the faculty that this issue
exists seems to have had the desired effect. The issues of student
stress and depression are now on the faculty’s radar screen.
Herbert N. Ramy (hramy@suffolk.edu)
is director of Suffolk University Law School’s Academic Support
Program. He also is a member of the executive board of the Association
for Humanizing Legal Education. His article is adapted from one
that appeared in fall 2004 issue of The Learning Curve, the newsletter
of the Association of American Law Schools’ Section on Academic
Support.
Read the article “Humanizing Law School” (Student
Lawyer, November 2002) at www.abanet.org/lsd/studentlawyer/online.
Student Lawyer welcomes contributions to Opinion. Views are those
of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the policy of the
American Bar Association or Law Student Division. Details for submitting
Opinion essays and letters to the editor can be found in our writers’ guidelines.
Return to top of page
Student
Lawyer home page |