|
Although the concept of the paperless law office has been
around for many years, a more appropriate organizational
metaphor is that of the electronically organized law office,
because the root causes of continuing lawyer inefficiency
are fundamentally archaic attorney attitudes (e.g., that
staff should do even minor clerical chores) and an organizational
approach that, unlike our own clients, continues to rely
largely upon legacy paper records despite their attendant
inefficiency and inflexibility. Moving to the next level
of law office efficiency requires abandoning paper files
as our basic organizational approach and instead embracing
electronic documents as our primary or even sole files.
In a sense, making the transition to an electronic
filing system is less difficult than you might imagine,
given that Evidence Rules 1001(3) and 1003 already make
explicit provisions for the use of printouts, electronic
records, and duplicates. And, given that modern digital
photocopiers are nothing more than a limited functionality
combination of scanner, storage, and laser printer,
there is no fundamental technological difference between
a photocopied duplicate and a document that is scanned,
stored on your hard disk in a locked format such as
Adobe Acrobat, and later printed as needed. Of course,
you will need to retain original documents to the extent
that might be necessary for recording, to prove your
case under Evidence Rules 1002 and 1003, or for other
similar reasons. You may need to show that any scanned
documents have not been altered, something that is reasonably
clear using a file format such as Acrobat PDF. However,
beyond that point, there is little reason to rely upon
a paper file as your primary office organizational paradigm.
Indeed, there is little reason to retain much of the
paper file at all.
At this point, I personally image any documents provided
by the client and then return those documents immediately
to the client. Similarly, rather than making photocopies
of all materials for a client, I image incoming materials,
such as disclosures, and then send to the client the
copies received from the opposing party, with a stamped
notation that we have electronically imaged the enclosed
documents and that the client should retain the paper
copies. Client copies of documents prepared by our offices
are simply laser prints of whatever we have prepared,
scanned into our electronic imaging case file, and then
sent to the opposing party. When a subset of records,
such as medical records, must be produced to the opposing
party, I find that it’s faster to personally review
and print the pertinent record sections rather than
manually go through a file, mark documents to be copied,
provide instructions to clerical staff, and then check
to ensure that everything was done correctly and that
no privileged materials were inadvertently disclosed.
Making the decision to change your office procedure
attitudes and paradigms, and then initially and consistently
following them, is the critical part. Transitioning
to a digital law office initially requires a little
more effort and discipline by both the attorney and
the client. However, within months, you’ll never
consider going back to the old, more costly paper paradigm.
Why, for example, should you pay someone to file a document
in the first place, pull it out whenever you need a
particular part of a file, refile the document, make
photocopies, reorganize the paper file from time to
time, and then repeat this process throughout a case?
Ultimately, the basic law office organization and
management problem is finding and exchanging the information
contained in paper records, which are more difficult
to search and perhaps improperly filed and refiled by
inexperienced staff. In that context, using your computer
systems as the primary means of electronically organizing
your office simplifies the use of paper files. For example,
scanned PDF documents are readily organized by date
on your computer system and, indeed, the same document
can be stored in several different file locations to
ensure that it is not overlooked. Restructuring a large
electronic case file takes perhaps an hour or two, not
a few days as with a paper file and, when done by an
associate attorney rather than a secretary, is fully
and appropriately billable. If you elect to retain a
paper file throughout the litigation, filing that paper
is much simpler when you can first search a digital
file. Because it’s fast and easy to first find
the electronic version and ascertain its date, you can
simply file any retained paper documents by date without
sorting them into different categories such as pleadings
and correspondence. This approach saves time compared
to filing, retrieving, and sometimes losing paper documents
that are filed by category. Clerical staff requirements
are reduced commensurately. My experience indicates
that this capability confers a tremendous litigation
advantage to the electronically organized side, particularly
when you need to be able to adapt instantly in trial
to new or impeachable evidence.
Most often, reviewing any documents or information
on your computer system will be sufficient for in-office
use. When you do need a hard copy, such as attachments
to a letter or pleading or for exhibits, you can print
out any documents as needed and then discard the paper
copies when they’re no longer necessary. You can
simply load the case file on to your notebook computer
or take it with you on one or two CDs.
Rather than elaborately planning a transition to a
digital filing system, just start doing it with new
documents as they’re produced and received. As
with computer CPUs and data caches, the most recent
information is that which will be used most frequently.
Within a few months, you’ll be seeing significant
benefits, particularly if you start imaging the most
important existing paper materials from current cases
as time permits. Assuming that you have a fast scanner
and fast laser printer in your office, you’ll
find it faster and more efficient to print and sign
a document, such as a letter or pleading, on the spot
and then immediately scan the executed copy into your
filing system before taking it out to your clerical
staff to fax, mail, or file with the court. Doing so
is an important step that takes perhaps an additional
minute of the attorney’s time while substantially
reducing inefficiency, staff overhead costs, and possible
oversight.
The suggestions here are just a first start that seems
to work in small offices. The beauty of the electronically
organized office is that it is easy, fast, and inexpensive
to change its overall structure and organizational paradigm
whenever that’s appropriate.
There are several secondary benefits to moving to
a digital filing system. Scanning and printing out paper
copies is often less than the direct cost of making
photocopies of the same documents, and your equipment
purchase and maintenance costs will likewise be lower.
It’s much easier to exchange documents with clients,
co-counsel and opposing counsel as PDF attachments to
e-mail messages. By burning a CD of the case file, you
can take your entire case file with you at home or when
traveling on a disc or two loaded on your notebook computer
rather than lugging around cases of paper documents
for the airlines to smash or lose. If you forget to
bring something critical, or if documents arrive while
you’re on the road, your office staff can image
them into PDF and send them to you as e-mail attachments
or, if you have remote access to your network, directly
download them. Should another attorney take over the
case, you can retain a complete copy of the file without
any stress at all. As you transition to a digital filing
system, your dead-file storage space requirements and
costs will drop dramatically. Finally, assuming that
you back-up your computer systems regularly, your practice
will be much less vulnerable to the disruption that
would otherwise occur in the event of fire, flood, or
other natural disaster.
It’s critical that you be consistent, particularly
when naming documents. Even if you store everything
in a single, unsubdivided folder, you can find what
you need quickly on a list display of all related documents
start with the same first word. For example, all discovery
should use "discovery" as a first word. A
motion for accounting might have its component documents
named "accounting - motion," "accounting
- memo," "accounting - affidavit in support,"
etc. However, you can scan all related documents into
a single PDF file, such as "accounting motion -
complete" and avoid that potential problem entirely.
Alternatively, using Acrobat’s capability to combine
several PDF files into a single document accomplishes
the same end. This same ability allows you to scan all
related documents once, simply print them out as needed
to attach to a hard copy of a letter or pleading, and
then only scan the executed letter or pleading itself,
along with any fax transmission confirmation sheet.
Then, combine all of the PDF files into a single document
that includes the letter or pleading, all attachments,
and the fax confirmation sheet. This is a neat and fast
solution that minimizes any chance that related documents
would become separated and lost.
An electronically organized office and litigation practice
gives you very substantial operational and financial
advantages. The cost savings, when coupled with appropriate
changes in the attorney’s attitudes and work habits,
will likely repay within months the costs of upgrading
to faster computers, scanners and laser printers. You’ll
be able to practice more effectively, particularly in
a litigation setting. Remember to keep your electronic
office organization as simple as possible and treat
legacy paper printouts as transient materials to be
used and discarded as needed.
Top
Joseph Kashi is an attorney and litigator
living in Soldotna, Alaska, who is active in the Law
Practice Management Section and a technology editor
for Law Practice Today. He has written regularly
on legal technology for the Law Practice Management
Section, Law Office Computing magazine and other publications
since 1990. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees
from MIT in 1973 and his J.D. from Georgetown University
in 1976, and is admitted to practice in Alaska, Pennsylvania,
the Ninth Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court.
|