|
New partners and old partners alike often have questions
about how capital accounts work in a law firm setting.
In this article, I will summarize some of the key issues
in hopes that it may provide insights to those struggling
with how to establish or administer these accounts for
their partners or shareholders.
There are generally two types of capital accounts.
Cash basis capital is generally contributed and represents
the amounts initially paid by new equity owners upon
their admission and additional amounts paid in on an
annual basis as cash needs arise. It is also possible
for cash basis capital to be "earned" either
in the form of undistributed profits in a partnership
or PLC setting or as increases in retained earnings
in a PC environment.
Annual amounts, both for new and existing owners,
are usually contributed based on some cash flow projections
that the firm makes simultaneously with the preparation
of the annual budget. If the firm needs total capital
of $1,000,000 and it already has $800,000, then the
capital call for that year is $200,000. If I am a 5%
owner, my total capital should be $50,000 (5% x $1,000,000).
If I already have a balance of, say, $40,000, then my
contribution for that year will be $10,000. If I happen
to be a brand new partner, coming in at 5%, then my
total contribution would be $50,000. When I terminate
from the firm for whatever reason, this amount is returned
to me in full or increased or decreased by the changes
that may have occurred in the firm's equity accounts.
In most firms, the capital percentages are tied somewhat
to income percentages. This means that older partners
with high capital balances who begin taking reductions
in compensation could actually receive refunds, which
are paid to them tax-free. If the amounts are not tied
together, then a firm could pay interest on capital
which ends up making everyone whole.
There are many firms that do not tie capital percentages
to income percentages, do not have annual capital calls,
and in some cases do not even require any contributions
from new partners. This latter group are firms who are
virtually owned by the bank and have huge debt either
in the form of permanent debt or lines of credit.
It must be emphasized that items such as client cost
advances, fixed asset purchases, and debt repayments
must come either from cash generated by net income or
through capital contributions. If from net income, it
means that income is earned for which there is no cash
to make a distribution, thus leaving the firm or the
individual partner with a tax liability and no cash
to pay the taxes. This is a situation that no firm wants
to have; thus, the need arises for some type of ownership
capital program.
The second type of capital is accrual basis capital,
which is "earned" as opposed to being contributed.
A common term for this is the owner's interest in ICS
which represents the Investment in Client Services.
It is just that: An owner's equity interest in services,
either in the form of work-in-progress or accounts receivable
that has yet to be converted into cash, factored by
some realization percentage geared to the historical
realization factors of the firm. It can also be referred
to as "deferred compensation." It is inventory
as defined in the service profession. Unlike a business
that manufactures a product for inventory and recognizes
income when the item is sold, when a time entry is made
a sale has been consummated. As an owner, I should get
credit for that sale. The fact that it has not been
paid in cash is irrelevant to the recognition of the
revenues. For those firms who do not keep time records,
this amount is represented by the value of unsettled
cases, factored for the expenses necessary to get the
cases to their ultimate conclusions.
There are some firms who also include accounts payable
as an offset against this. However, since these amounts
generally turn over each year and are not significant,
they are normally not included. If the firm owns real
estate which is included within the firm (something
that is not recommended), then the difference between
the market value and book value may also be taken into
consideration. Offsets could also include the value
of the office lease, significant pending malpractice
claims, etc.
In most cases a partner comes into the ownership class
with a zero interest in ICS and accumulates it during
his lifetime as an owner. The increases (or decreases)
are either added to or subtracted from each year's balance
to get a new balance, based on the owner's income percentage.
Thus, if I am a 5% owner, and the ICS increases $200,000,
I get $10,000 added to my prior year balance.
Getting a system like this started is always a problem,
but there are many ways to do this. Whichever way you
choose, there need to be certain safeguards built into
the system so that the firm does not run the risk of
being bankrupted with a large exodus of partners with
huge amounts of accrual basis capital accounts. These
are also outlined in those articles. One popular means
of protection is to purchase whole life insurance, the
proceeds of which go to the existing partners at the
time of death. Although the premiums must be paid with
after-tax dollars, the protection this affords against
significant cash drains more than offsets the tax ramifications
of this type of policy. It is now possible to purchase
insurance that has automatic increases built in so that
the benefit increases as the deferred compensation balances
increase.
There are some firms that require partners to buy
into the accrual basis capital accounts, in effect "purchasing"
amounts from other partners. This is not a good idea
since the amounts of the contribution become so large
that no one can ever afford to become a partner. This
could also become a severe detriment to lateral hires
or merger opportunities.
Hopefully this will give you a start as you deal with
this very critical issue in your firm. Have a good accountant
on hand or take a look at some of the many good sources
on the subject including Partner's Report which
covers these issues regularly (e.g., "Accumulating
Equity in a Professional Service Firm" and "Who
Owns Your Work-in-Process and Accounts Receivable").
Top
John G. Iezzi is the president of the Iezzi
Management Group in Richmond, Virginia, and the
author of Results-Oriented
Financial Management: A Step-by-Step Guide to Law
Firm Profitability, Second Edition published
by the ABA Law Practice Management Section (ABA 2003)
|