Jump to Navigation | Jump to Content
 
  |  Join ABA  |  Media  |  Contact
Advanced Search
Topics A-Z
 

 
Print This  |  E-mail This

ABA Section of Litigation
Diversity & Public Service
 

The Litigation Research Fund


The ABA Section of Litigation established The Litigation Research Fund in Fall 2007 to support original and practical scholarly work that significantly advances the understanding of civil litigation in the United States. This research fund supports research and writing projects in two broad areas: First, scholarship relevant to litigation policy (e.g., on issues important to rule makers, legislators, or courts, or helpful to the organized bar in developing guidelines and formulating positions); and second, scholarship bearing on litigation practice (such as writings addressing trial skills or other aspects of how litigators conduct their work). Funded scholarship may relate to judicial administration; judicial independence; rules and standards relating to litigation (e.g., ethics rules, rules of evidence, and rules of civil procedure); the assistance of counsel; trial and discovery practice; or the jury process, among others. Individual awards of between $5,000 and $20,000 are awarded. Legal academics as well as social scientists and scholars from other disciplines are invited to apply.


In the first half of 2008, the Section of Litigation agreed to support the following seven projects, selected from among approximately 40 applications.


  1. What Do We Know About Jury Verdicts? Evaluating Data Sources That Influence Civil Litigation.” Nicole L. Waters, Cynthia G. Lee, and their colleagues at the National Center for State Courts will explore the uses of jury verdict reporter data, including by litigators and by legislators and advocates seeking tort reform and other litigation reform, and will test the accuracy of this commercial data by comparing it with empirical data directly from state courts, culminating in the publication of an article discussing the findings.
  2. The Federal Side of Shareholder Litigation.” Jessica Erickson, Richmond School of Law, will review case records of shareholder derivative lawsuits filed in federal court in 2005 to gather information about, among other things, the nature of the plaintiffs, the allegations, the use of special litigation committees, the benefits to corporations flowing from the lawsuits, and the relationship to other litigation, and then publish an article describing the findings and offering policy recommendations on how legislation might improve the law governing derivative lawsuits.
  3. Understanding the Impact of Social Science Research on School Finance Litigation.” Jeanne M. Powers, Arizona State University, will analyze the judicial use of social science research in school finance cases decided in state supreme courts from 1971 to 2006 in order to study how courts use social science research to resolve difficult public policy questions in the face of conflicting research findings. Her work will examine the relationship between school finance litigation, social science research and educational equity.
  4. Settlement and Trial? An Empirical Study of High-Low Agreements.” J.J. Prescott, Univ. of Michigan Law School, and Albert Yoon, Northwestern Univ. School of Law, will explore, theoretically and empirically, the nature and effects of high-low settlement agreements in order to develop and publish findings useful to both policymakers and practitioners.  Among the questions are: Under what conditions do litigants opt for a high-low agreement; how does the content of the high-low agreement vary with litigation costs; how effectively do litigants use high-low agreements; and who is the primary beneficiary of such agreements?
  5. A Proposed Study of the Functioning of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.” Michael Saks, Roselle L. Wissler, Betsy Grey and Guy Cardineau, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University, will study the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), established in 1986, as an example of a modern no-fault compensation system, by interviewing actors in the program, analyzing case processing and decision-making, and studying the program’s operation and evolution over time.
  6. Debts, Defaults, and Details: Exploring the Impact of Consumer Debt Collection on American Courts.” Mary Spector, SMU Dedman School of Law, will collect empirical evidence regarding the current practice of debt collection litigation by reviewing court records in Dallas County and at least one other jurisdiction outside Texas. Prof. Spector will attempt to identify differences in cases where debtors make an appearance and those in which they do not and identify emerging trends to explore whether existing rules and procedures adequately protect the integrity of the judicial system.
  7. “The Litigation Bounty: A Study of the Comparative Effectiveness of Monetary Rewards as Compliance Systems.” Orly Lobel, University of San Diego School of Law, and Yuval Feldman, Bar-Ilan University, will conduct an empirical study of the federal False Claim Act’s qui tam bounty program to analyze the effect of the program’s incentives in motivating whistle-blowing and private enforcement litigation.

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS Deadline August 31, 2008

Applications for the second round of funding are now being accepted.


Preference will be given to works with an empirical foundation, although they need not involve original data collection.  Position papers, comparative and historical scholarship, and other original academic work of practical significance to litigation and litigators will also qualify for funding.  Works already in progress are eligible.  Authors will maintain the copyrights in their works; however, the Section of Litigation will receive the non-exclusive right to distribute, publicize and quote from the completed works in order to make them available, as appropriate, to members of the Section of Litigation, courts, lawmakers and policymakers, and others.


Applicants should submit a statement describing the project with a project title and how it will be conducted; the form the final product will take (e.g., article or book); when it will be completed; the importance of the project in light of the above criteria; and a project budget.  Please include grantee institution’s name and contact person with e-mail and mailing address. The award is not intended to cover institutions’ indirect costs.  Awardees will be asked to sign the ABA grant conditions before the award is made. A curriculum vita including a list of the applicant’s prior publications should also be submitted.  Priority consideration for the next awards will be given to submissions received by August 31, 2008.  For additional information, contact: Professor Bruce Green.


Applications should be submitted by e-mail with the subject line “Litigation Research Fund” to Monica Cortez, ABA Section of Litigation, with copies to Robert Nelson, Director, American Bar Foundation, and Professor Bruce Green.

 

Resources

For more information on The Litigation Research Fund, contact Monica Cortez.






 
 

Back to Top

Copyright American Bar Association. http://www.abanet.org