Using the Lessons of Aristotle to Present Outstanding Oral Arguments
By Lawrence D. Rosenberg; Jones Day (Washington, DC)
Delivering
oral argument can sometimes appear to be a daunting task. An advocate may experience
pangs of self-doubt. He or she may wonder: What if the Judge doesn't like me?
What if the Judge thinks my case is terrible? What if the Judge falls asleep
during my argument? Such concerns are natural. Oral argument can be difficult
and occasionally unpleasant. But, with an understanding of how to present an
effective oral argument and perhaps some experience doing so, delivering oral
argument to a judge, arbitrator, or mediator can be both very rewarding for the
advocate and very important to the advocate's case.
This article sets forth a number of approaches, strategies, and tips for presenting outstanding and compelling oral arguments to trial and appellate judges, arbitrators and mediators. It begins by turning to an old friend of oral advocates—Aristotle—for some fundamental principles for delivering effective oral arguments. It next examines the critical steps in preparing for an oral argument. Finally, it discusses a number of techniques for presenting outstanding oral arguments in today's courts and ADR settings.
Get access to full program materials, online exclusive exclusives and subscriptions to Litigation and Litigation News by joining the Section of Litigation today.




