The death penalty, like baseball, is an American institution. And, like baseball, the death penalty is a deeply troubled institution. But, unlike baseball, it has been hopelessly mired in race, class, scandal, incredulity, inconsistency, and disgrace from its very beginnings—and this continues uninterrupted to the present moment. The death penalty has become a cancer on the American justice system.

Monitoring Death Sentencing Decisions: The Challenges and Barriers to Equity
Much more needs to be done to effectively monitor homicide cases, ensuring only the worst offenders are being sentenced to death. Given the finality of this punishment, even infrequent mistakes in the application of the death penalty will receive widespread coverage and call into question the overall fairness of the system.
By Glenn L. Pierce and Michael L. Radelet

Mental Disability and Capital Punishment: A More Rational Approach to a Disturbing Subject
In 2002, in Atkins v. Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court held that execution of people with mental retardation violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. It is important to consider whether some of the same concerns underlying Atkins might apply to people with other types of impaired mental conditions.
By Ronald J. Tabak

Will New Jersey Ban Capital Punishment? Understanding the Death Penalty Study Commission Report
In 2006, the thirteen-member Death Penalty Study Commission was created to examine all aspects of New Jersey’s death penalty. Those on the commission came from different places with different experiences, but all agreed the death penalty in New Jersey should be replaced by life without parole.
By Eddie Hicks

ABA State Death Penalty Assessments: Facts (Un)Discovered, Progress (to Be) Made, and Lessons Learned
Over the past thirty years, the ABA has become increasingly concerned that capital jurisdictions too often provide neither fairness nor accuracy in the administration of the death penalty. After studying eight states that retain the death penalty, the ABA moratorium project concludes that each system has serious problems.
By Deborah Fleischaker

Raising the Bar in Capital Cases
Lawyers and bar associations cannot do much to eliminate the arbitrariness of the application of capital punishment, but they can act to require competence and ethical behavior of all lawyers involved in capital cases.
By Talbot D’Alemberte

The Global Debate on the Death Penalty
Many human rights organizations and intergovernmental organizations, such as the European Union, see the death penalty as one of the most pressing human rights issues of our time and have taken an active role in persuading countries to halt executions.
By Sandra Babcock

Staying Executions: After Expanding the Death Penalty, the Pendulum Swings Back
A newfound willingness by judges and prosecutors in several states to revisit old capital cases has led to many well-publicized exonerations of death row inmates. As a result, the U.S. Supreme Court, which in large measure has the final say on whether and to what extent capital punishment may be used, has begun to pay more attention to death penalty procedures.
By Andrew Cohen

A Journey to Abolition
Sam Millsap began his journey as a supporter of the death penalty and has since become one of the country’s most powerful advocates for abolition.
By Virginia Sloan

Human Rights Hero: Anthony G. Amsterdam
Professor Amsterdam is recognized as a hero for his extraordinary legal career, including his over forty years of leadership, both in front and behind the scenes and for his litigation strategy that resulted in the United States being free from executions from 1967 to 1977.
By Ronald J. Tabak