| |
: Wednesday,
April 13
: Thursday, April 14
: Friday, April 15
: Saturday, April 16
|
|
Program
Details
(Subject to change.)
|
|
| |
WEDNESDAY
APRIL 13, 2005
|
|
| |
8:45 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. |
|
Practical Tips on Intellectual
Property Law
Separate registration required. See www.abanet.org/intelprop/2005ptips_dc/home.html for
further details on this one-day program and to register online.
|
|
| |
5:00 – 8:00 p.m. |
|
Open Registration
and Check-in and Chilli Reception
Stop by on Wednesday evening to check-in early before the start of programming
on Thursday morning. Avoid standing in long lines on Thursday morning by checking
in early and picking up your conference materials the evening before. A special
chili reception will be offered, with a variety of chili recipes available for
sampling, along with other treats and cocktails. Enjoy this chance to check-in
early, gather with your fellow IP practitioners, and exchange ideas before the
conference officially commences on Thursday morning.
|
|
| |
THURSDAY
APRIL 14, 2005
|
|
| |
7:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. |
|
Registration
and Check-in
|
|
| |
8:30 – 10:00 a.m.
Two General Sessions |
|
I Getting Quick Relief
Against an Infringer: The ITC, A Preliminary Injunction, or a Rocket
Docket?
The panel will discuss the three different ways of trying to obtain
quick relief from an infringer: filing a Section 337 case at the International
Trade Commission, filing for a preliminary injunction, or filing in
a rocket docket. The panel will discuss the advantages and disadvantages
of each of these strategies and will also consider some of the reasons
for the recent growth in the ITC docket.
Administrative Remarks
Monique Morneault, Wallenstein Wagner & Rockey,
Ltd., Chicago, IL. Program Co-Chair.
Welcome Remarks
William L.LaFuze, Vinson & Elkins
LLP, Houston, TX. Chair, ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law.
Moderator
James B. Altman, Miller & Chevalier, Ltd.,
Washington, DC
Speakers
F. David Foster, Miller & Chevalier,
Ltd., Washington, DC
William H. Mandir, Sughrue Mion PLLC, Washington,
DC
In-House
Counsel, to be announced
II Recent Developments in the Protection
and Use of Databases
Recent case law developments
in the U.S. and analysis of U.S. federal legislative proposals and
developments in the European Union, including recent cases, concerning
the protection and use of databases.
Administrative Remarks
Amy J. Benjamin, Darby & Darby
PC, New York, NY. Program Co-Chair.
Welcome Remarks
E. Anthony Figg, Rothwell, Figg,
Ernst & Manbeck,
PC, Washington, DC. Chair-Elect, ABA Section of Intellectual
Property Law.
Moderator
Mark H. Wittow, Preston Gates and Ellis LLP,
Seattle, WA
Speakers
Jonathan Band, Morrison & Foerster LLP,
Washington, DC
Paul Barton, Field Fisher Waterhouse, London, United
Kingdom
Christopher A. Mohr, Meyer, Klipper & Mohr,
PLLC, Washington, DC
|
|
| |
10:15 – 11:45 a.m.
Three Concurrent Breakout Sessions |
|
I The
Patent System in Transition– Lots of Moving Parts
This session will be available via ABA-CLE
Teleconference from 10:15 - 11:45 a.m.
Change is being urged from many quarters for US Patent law and
practice. Major institutions of government and the IP bar are actively
promoting various agendas. This panel will analyze many of the
proposals for change and assess their merits.
Panel Program Chair
Ronald J. Myrick, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
Garrett & Dunner,
LLP, Cambridge, MA
Moderator
Don W. Martens, Knobbe, Martens, Olsen & Bear,
LLP, Irvine, CA
Speakers
Donna M. Meuth, Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering,
Hale and Dorr, LLP, Boston, MA
Sharon R. Barner, Foley & Lardner,
LLP, Chicago, IL
Hayden W. Gregory, Legislative Consultant, Section of
Intellectual Property Law, American Bar Association, Washington,
DC
Gary L. Griswold, 3M Innovative Properties Co., St. Paul, MN
II Open Standards—The
Coming Storm In Information Technology and Bioinformatics
Co-sponsored by the ABA Section
of Science & Technology Law
Standardization can be the key to the success of any technology.
In modern intellectual property regimes, standardization can be curtailed
by the existence of proprietary standards. The solution to this challenge
has often been ad-hoc, or controlled by large players in a technology
industry sector. Our panel of experts discusses the next challenges
of proprietary standards in information technology and life sciences.
Moderator
Heather J. Meeker, Greenberg Traurig, LLP,
East Palo Alto, CA
Speakers
Daniel Weitzner, Technology and Society Domain Leader,
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Cambridge, MA
Scott Bradner, Internet
Engineering Task Force (IETF), Cambridge, MA
Vicky Markstein, IEEE
Computer Society Bioinformatics Technical Chair, in silico Labs,
Palo Alto, CA (invited)
Bruce Perens, Senior Research Scientist in
charge of Open Source, Cyber Security Policy Research Institute,
George Washington University, Washington, DC
Law firm speaker on private standards, to be announced
III Corporate Identity Value -- The Valuation
of Goodwill and Trademarks
The value of corporate goodwill and trademarks
and the accompanying trademark goodwill. Does a company’s
goodwill have value without an accompanying trademark? Valuation
of national and global trademark portfolios will be discussed using
real case studies, as well as the value of corporate goodwill in
a business deal or merger, in bankruptcy or re-organization or
in litigation.
Moderator
Weston Anson, CONSOR, La Jolla, CA
Speakers
Russell Parr, The Blackstone Group, New York, NY
Eduardo Carreras, Partner, Perception Partners, Atlanta, GA
Daryl Martin, CONSOR, La Jolla, CA
|
|
| |
12:00 – 1:30 p.m. |
|
LUNCHEON (tickets required)
Guest Speaker: George Galt
Director
of Business Affairs, The Associated Press, Washington, DC
George Galt is in charge of licensing and protecting
AP’s intellectual
property. Before joining AP three years ago, he was an associate at
Drinker, Biddle & Reath, LLP. He practiced copyright and trademark
law, specializing in legislative, licensing and enforcement issues.
Previously he was the deputy press secretary for the United States
House of Representative’s Subcommittee on Telecommunications
and Finance, and has also worked as a freelance computer programmer.
He received his bachelor’s degree from the University of Colorado
at Boulder and his law degree from American University. He is a member
of the District of Columbia and Massachusetts bars.
|
|
| |
1:45 – 5:00
p.m.
General Sessions
|
|
Hot Topics in Trademark
Law and TTAB Year in Review
Moderator
Stephanie M. Foster, Associate Counsel, Pearson Education, Inc.,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
|
|
| |
1:45 – 2:45 p.m. |
|
Trademark Trial and
Appeals Board: Year in Review
Speakers
John L. Welch, Foley Hoag LLP, Boston, MA
Hon. Carlisle Walters, Trademark Trial and Appeal
Board, U.S. Patent & Trademark
Office, Alexandria, VA
|
|
| |
2:45 – 2:50 p.m.
|
|
Break |
|
| |
2:50 – 3:50 p.m. |
|
Fair Use and Initial
Interest Confusion: Key Issues for the Future
This portion of the Trademark Hot Topics panel, on Fair Use,
will be available via ABA-CLE Teleconference from 1:45-2:45 p.m.
The question of when it is permissible to use another
party's trademark as well as the role of initial interest confusion in
determining trademark infringement are critical to many developing cases
such as key word sales and sponsored search listings. The Supreme Court will issue
a ruling on fair use during this term. The panel will explore these
issues and the implications for your practice.
Speakers
Stephen W. Feingold, Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch,
New York, NY
Elizabeth H. Cohen, Arent Fox PLLC, Washington, DC
|
|
| |
3:50 – 4:00 p.m. |
|
Break
|
|
| |
4:00 – 5:00 p.m. |
|
The Use and Misuse of "Use in Commerce"
The question of when a mark is actually in use in
the United States has become increasingly important with the advent
of global marketing and on-line sales without borders. On one end of the spectrum,
the Fourth Circuit has made it much easier to prove use in interstate
commerce while other courts have found in favor of defendants because
they found the defendant had not used the mark in commerce. Learn
more about how these changing definitions may affect your practice.
Speakers
Jordan S. Weinstein, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland,
Maier & Neustadt,
P.C., Alexandria, VA
Jason A. Cody, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt,
P.C., Alexandria, VA
Robin Smith, Counsel, LEGO Systems, Inc.
|
|
| |
1:45 – 2:45
p.m.
Three Concurrent
Breakout Sessions |
|
I Political Parody:
IP Owners Aren't
Laughing
What unique trademark and copyright issues arise
when intellectual property is “borrowed” for use in advertising for political
purposes? Should such use of others’ intellectual property enjoy
immunity as fair use under the trademark and copyright law? Or are
there limits to the kind of copying that can be done in this context?
How have courts defined the scope of permissible use for political
advertising? Have IP owner’s needs been adequately addressed,
or are IP owners being over-zealous in enforcing their rights?
Moderator
Jay Kogan, Deputy General Counsel, DC Comics,
New York, NY
Speakers
Stacy J. Grossman, Fish & Richardson P.C.,
New York, NY
Paul V. LiCalsi, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal
LLP, New York, NY
Jeanne Hamburg, Norris McLaughlin & Marcus,
P.A., New York, NY
II The Exploding European Practice
The panel will discuss the significance of the tremendous increase
in EPO Member States which will soon reach 32 countries. It will
address some of the new changes in European Practice including the
Extended European Search Report (EESR) and Delays after R-51(4) Communications.
The program will also cover the new Board of Appeals Decision concerning
the use of disclaimers. Finally, the panel will discuss different
claim practices between U.S. and Europe and how to address European
claiming procedures.
Moderator
Samson Helfgott, KMZ Rosenman, New York, NY
Speakers
Dr. Rudy Weinberger, EPO Patent Attorney,
Vossius and Partner, Munich, Germany
Colin Philpott, Principal Director Methods, European Patent Office,
Munich, Germany
III The Party is Not Over: Intellectual Property
Exclusions in CGL Policies May Not Limit Coverage as Drastically
as Insurers Contend
This panel will address current issues relating
to coverage for intellectual property claims, including exclusions
to advertising injury coverage and exceptions to such exclusions.
Facilitator
David A. Gauntlett, Gauntlett & Associates, Irvine,
CA
|
|
| |
3:00 – 5:00 p.m.
Breakout
Session
|
|
IV Trade Secret Law
Moderator
Barry L. Cohen, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, LLP, Philadelphia,
PA
Speakers
Michael G. Ermer, Irell & Manella LLP, Newport Beach,
CA
H. Alan Rothenbuecher, Schottenstein Zox & Dunn,
Cleveland, OH
R. Mark Halligan, Welsh & Katz, Ltd., Chicago,
IL
|
|
| |
3:00 – 5:00 p.m.
General
Session
|
|
Current Trends in Patent Law, Litigation, Prosecution,
Licensing and Settlement
This panel will provide an update on current trends in patent law,
including a review of the Federal Circuit's decisions during the past
year, lessons learned trying patent cases, developments in patent prosecution,
and a discussion on recent issues in litigation, licensing and settlement.
Moderator
Gordon T. Arnold, Arnold & Ferrera, LLP, Houston,
TX
Speakers
Federal Circuit and Patents - A Year in Review
John J. Gresens, Merchant & Gould, Minneapolis, MN
The Thirty Years (of) War: Lessons Learned Trying Patent Cases
Kenneth R. Adamo, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH
Developments in Patent Prosecution
Stephen G. Kunin, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt,
PC, Alexandria, VA
Licensing with an Eye Toward Litigation - An Updated View
Charles H. De La Garza, Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, Austin, TX
Patents in the Crosshairs: Saving the Validity of your Patent
Cynthia E. Kernick, Reed Smith, LLP, Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
| |
5:30 – 7:00 p.m. |
|
RECEPTION
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
Thursday's
Coffee Breaks are co-sponsored by BNA Books, Inc.
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| |
FRIDAY APRIL 15, 2005
|
|
| |
8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. |
|
Registration and Check-in
|
|
| |
8:30 – 10:30 a.m.
General Session
|
|
The Inside View on Judicially Assisted ADR
To alleviate the increasing congestion on court
dockets, more and more jurisdictions, both at the federal and state
levels, are requiring or encouraging ADR as part of their local rules
of procedures. These
judicially assisted ADR programs are seeing more success, and provide
litigants and counsel alike with opportunities to settle at various
points in the litigation that they otherwise would not have. This
program panel provides the inside view on such programs, the judiciaries’ view
on the process, and the strategies that litigants can use to reach
a successful outcome for all parties involved in the process. Moderator
James E. Hanft, Senior Counsel, Darby & Darby P.C.,
New York, NY
Speakers
Frederick L. Cottrell III, Richards, Layton & Finger,
P.A., Wilmington, DE
Hon. Mary Pat Thynge, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for
the District of Delaware, Wilmington, DE
Hon. Donald F. Parsons, Jr., Vice Chancellor, Delaware Court of
Chancery, Wilmington, DE
Kenneth K. Cho, Principal Attorney, Philips Intellectual
Property & Standards,
Briarcliff Manor, NY
|
|
| |
8:30 – 11:45 a.m.
General Session |
|
Intellectual Property and Virtual Worlds
This panel will begin with a demonstration of the
latest in virtual world and massively multiplayer game technology as
well as an introduction to Machinima, the art of making films using
videogame technology. One
of the fastest growing segments of the entertainment software market,
these graphically rich and interactive platforms emphasize the creation
of original intellectual property by their users. The emergence of
this technology and the trade in virtual goods to which it is giving
rise is resulting in thorny questions about the appropriate legal treatment
of intellectual property created within the game as well as the treatment
of off-line intellectual property imported into the digital environment. Moderator
Beth Simone Noveck, Director, Institute for Information
Law and Policy and the Democracy Design Workshop, New York Law School,
New York, NY
Speakers
Edward Castronova, Associate Professor of Telecommunications,
Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
James Grimmelmann, Student Fellow, Information Society Project,
Yale Law School, New Haven, CT
Dan Hunter, Assistant Professor of Legal Studies, The Wharton School,
Law Department, Philadelphia, PA
Greg Lastowka, Assistant Professor of Law, Rutgers University School
of Law, Camden, NJ
Cory Ondrejka, VP of Product Development, Second Life, Linden Lab,
San Francisco, CA
David R. Johnson, Visiting Professor, New York
Law School, Washington, DC
|
|
| |
10:45 – 11:45 a.m.
Three Concurrent
Breakout Sessions
|
|
I Latest Developments in Electronic
Filing
Updates on current technology issues and developments in electronic
filing will be followed by a practical demonstration.
Moderator
William C. Rowland, Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis,
LLP, Alexandria, VA
Speakers
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office speaker to be announced
Maria Eliseeva, Houston Eliseeva LLP, Lexington, MA
II Mining Uncle Sam's
IP Portfolio: Strategies for Commercializing Government IP
A panel discussion of the strategic legal and economic issues to
consider in connection with a potential purchase or license of intellectual
property assets from the United States government and the future
commercialization of those assets.
Moderator
Bryan J. Sinclair, Dechert LLP, Palo Alto, CA
Speakers
Richard Ostiller, Director, Navigant Consulting, Palo Alto,
CA
Kathi Kedrowski, Partner, Leader of Intellectual
Assets Solutions Practice, Ernst & Young Global Investigations
and Dispute Advisory, Chicago, IL
III Using Intellectual Property to Combat Bioterrorism
Co-sponsored by the ABA Section of
Science & Technology
Law
This program will explore the relationship between intellectual property
law and development of bioterrorism countermeasures, focusing in
large part on changes to intellectual property law that might remove
or alleviate some of the unique scientific, legal, and economic impediments
to the research and development of these products. Panelists will
discuss the intellectual property provisions of S666, as well as
broader commercial and business questions (key differences between
the biopharmaceutical sector and traditional defense contractors,
for example, and between smaller start-up companies and well-established
companies) as well as public policy questions (whether there are
better ways to ensure the necessary research is done, for example,
and whether there might be unintended consequences to IP reform).
Moderator
Erika F. Lietzan, Assistant General Counsel, PhRMA, Washington,
DC
Speakers
Charles Ludlam, Counsel, Office of Senator Joseph Lieberman,
Washington, DC
Tim Westmoreland, Visiting Professor of Law, Research Professor
of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
|
|
| |
12:00 – 1:30 p.m. |
|
LUNCHEON (tickets
required)
Guest Speaker: Stephen M. Pinkos
Deputy Undersecretary of Commerce and Deputy Director of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA
Stephen
M. Pinkos was sworn in as Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO) on August 9, 2004. Secretary of Commerce Donald L.
Evans appointed him to the position. Prior to joining the USPTO, Mr.
Pinkos was Staff Director and Deputy General Counsel for the House
Judiciary Committee. In that capacity he worked on a number of intellectual
property related issues including legislation implementing the USPTO
21st Century Strategic Plan, IP piracy, Madrid protocol implementation,
copyright arbitration, web casting and database protection.
 |
|
 |
| |
Friday's Luncheon
is sponsored by Kirkland & Ellis LLP.

|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| |
1:45 – 5:00 p.m.
General
Session
|
|
Procuring and Enforcing Intellectual Property
Rights in the People's Republic of China
Moderator
Elizabeth Chien-Hale, Institute for Intellectual Property
in Asia, Fremont, CA
Speakers
J. Benjamin Bai, Ph.D., Of Counsel, Jones Day, Houston,
TX, and Shanghai, China
Mark Cohen, IP Attache, U.S. Embassy, Beijing Economic Section,
Beijing, China
Lulin Gao, President, All-China Patent Agents Association, and former
Commissioner of the State Intellectual Property Office, Beijing,
China
Albert L. Jacobs, Jr., Chair, National Intellectual Property Practice,
and Co-Chair, National Life Sciences Practice, Greenberg Traurig
LLP, New York, NY
Hon. Judge Zhonglin He, People’s Supreme Court of the People’s
Republic of China, Beijing, China (invited)
Naomi Abe Voegtli, Global IP Pacific-Rim Asia, SAP AG, Walldorf,
Germany
|
|
| |
1:45 – 3:15 p.m.
Three Concurrent
Breakout Session
|
|
I IP Litigation 101– Financing
and Budgeting
Managing and budgeting IP litigation is one
of the most difficult tasks, with consequences ranging from unexpected
financial impacts to relationship-ending situations. In-house IP counsel
will share some creative financing options that they have been offered
or have heard about. They will also share how their outside
attorneys may have budgeted for and managed the finances of various
IP litigations in the past. Topics will include budgeting for
and financing of IP cases using tools such as task based billing,
blended rates, capped fees, success bonuses, and partial contingency
possibilities and also include how they are modified and realized
through the life of an IP case. Attendees will gain an enhanced
umderstanding of budgeting and financing IP litigation.
Moderator
William P. Atkins, Pillsbury Winthrop, LLP, Washington, DC
Speakers
Dr. Bruce Stuckman, Vice President and General Counsel, SBC
Knowledge Ventures, Austin, TX
Sue R. Halverson, Vice President, Intellectual Property
Litigation, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN
Seth Brown, Assistant General Counsel, America Online, Inc.,
Dulles, VA
II Privacy, Copyright, Security, Advertising– The Perfect
Storm
Co-sponsored
by the ABA Section of Science & Technology Law
Lawyers and clients today must reconcile the different paradigms
of privacy in the international market place. The views of privacy
and morality differ greatly between the US and the EU; This dramatically
affects how you do business over the internet. This program will
discuss Copyright vs.Security and explore if the public domain can
be fenced away from the public. The panel will also define; explore;
and try to make order of the advertising mischiefs, "phishing"
"spamming" "metatags" and "mouse-trapping".
Finally, Practicalities of prudent prize promotion and how the rules
change when what is offered are games of skill vs. the games of
chance. This fast moving, cutting-edge program is a must for any
lawyer dealing in the international e-commerce arena.
Moderator
Katherine Spelman, Piper Rudnick, LLP, San Francisco,
CA
Speakers
Tsan Abrahamson, Abrahamson Group PC, Berkeley, CA
Andrea Rush, Heenan Blaikie LLP, Toronto, ON, Canada
Andrew L. Deutsch, Piper Rudnick, LLP, New York, NY
III Liabilities on the Internet:
Congress Grapples with P2P Technology
This session will be available via ABA-CLE Teleconference from
1:45-3:15 p.m.
Moderator
Ralph Oman, Dechert LLP, Washington, DC
Speakers
Pamela Samuelson, Chancellor's Professor of Law and Information
Management, UC Berkeley, and Director of the Berkeley Center for
Law and Technology, Berkeley, CA
Jule Sigall, Associate Register of Copyrights for Policy and International
Affairs, U.S. Copyright Office, Washington, DC
Alan Davidson, Associate Director, Center for
Democracy & Technology,
Washington, DC
Steven Marks, General Counsel, Recording Industry Association of
America, Washington, DC
|
|
| |
3:30 – 5:00 p.m.
General Session
|
|
Improving Your Markman-ship: Hitting the Bullseye
on Claim Construction
Increasingly, Markman proceedings have become the be-all and end-all
of patent litigation. Cases are won and lost at Markman, and rarely
make it to trial any longer. A panel of Markman experts, including
judges, patent litigators, clients, and academics, discuss the strategies
that lead to winning claim construction, the use of tutorials and experts,
the presentation of dictionary definitions, the use of effective visual
aids, and the interplay with dispositive motion practice.
Moderator
Richard de Bodo, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles,
CA
Speakers
Hon. Patti B. Savis, U.S. District Court for the District
of Massachusetts, Boston, MA
Hon. T. John Ward, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Texas, Marshall, TX
Claire Laporte, Foley Hoag, LLP, Boston, MA
|
|
| |
6:30 – 7:15 p.m. |
|
RECEPTION
|
|
| |
7:15 – 9:30 p.m. |
|
IP LAW DINNER
(included in registration fee)
Guest Speaker: Sarah B. Deutsch
Vice President
and Associate General Counsel, Verizon Communications, Arlington,
VA
Sarah B. Deutsch is Vice President and
Associate General Counsel for Verizon Communications. Her practice
covers legal issues in the area of global Internet policy, including
liability, privacy, intellectual property policy and Internet jurisdiction.
She currently represents Verizon on a host of domestic and international
Internet issues ranging from digital rights management, the RIAA
v. Verizon litigation, Europe’s IPR Enforcement Directive,
ICANN, and legal issues arising from other Internet-related legislation
and litigation. She served as Private Sector Advisor to the U.S.
Delegation to the World Intellectual Property Organization 1996
Conference on the WIPO Copyright Treaties. She was one five negotiators
for the U.S. telecommunications industry in the negotiations that
resulted in the passage of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act.
 |
|
 |
| |
Friday's Dinner is
sponsored by
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP.

|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
Friday's
Coffee Breaks are co-sponsored by Dechert, LLP.
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| |
SATURDAY, APRIL 16, 2005
|
|
| |
8:00 a.m. – 11:00 p.m. |
|
Registration and Check-in
|
|
| |
8:30 – 11:45 a.m.
Four Concurrent
Breakout Sessions
|
|
I Maximizing
the Return on Your IP Assets
This panel will give you the insider’s
view to creating a strategic intellectual property management process,
generating income from intellectual property, and creating IP technology
assets.
Moderator
Steven I. Weisburd, Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky,
LLP, New York, NY
Speakers
Joseph O’Shea, Vice-President – Licensing, General
Electric Company, Fairfield, CT
Donald Davis, Managing Director and General Counsel, ipCapital Group,
Inc., Williston, VT
Gary M. Hoffman, Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky,
LLP, Washington, DC
II Knorr-Bremse:
The Federal Circuit Puts the Brakes on the Willfulness Game
In Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge
GmBH v. Dana Corp., the Federal Circuit abolished the inference that
a legal opinion was or would have been unfavorable if an infringer
does not produce exculpatory advice of counsel in response to a charge
of willfulness. Thus, adverse inferences no longer are warranted
where attorney-client privilege is asserted to protect advice of
counsel or where advice of counsel was not obtained. Indeed, no longer must an accused infringer
risk a full or partial waiver of the attorney-client privilege by
producing an exculpatory opinion in order to avoid that inference.
Eliminating those adverse inferences while at the same time preserving
the duty of due care to take reasonably prudent steps to avoid infringement
raises essential questions regarding the duty of due care to avoid
willful infringement. For example, what actions meet this duty
and, in particular, it is advisable to obtain and produce exculpatory
advice of competent counsel in response to a charge of willfulness.
Moderator
Emily A. Evans, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Palo Alto,
CA
Speakers
Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner,
LLP, Washington, DC
Brian P. Barrett, Patent Counsel, Eli Lilly Company, Indianapolis,
IN
Joel W. Nomkin, Perkins Coie Brown & Bain,
P.A., Phoenix, AZ
Richard P. Beem, Beem Patent Law Firm, Chicago, IL
Hon. Randall R. Rader, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,
Washington, DC
Hon. James R. Holderman, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois, Chicago, IL (invited)
III Preparing to Prevail: Preliminary
Injunction Practice Pointers
The presentation will cover the procedural requirements associated
with motions for injunctive relief under Rule 65, including those
for temporary restraining orders. This will include a review of evidentiary
requirements and other idiosyncrasies particular to various federal
courts across the nation. There will be a substantive aspect, focusing
on the legal standards applicable to particular types of cases (e.g.,
trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret). Finally, the Panel will
discuss the many strategic considerations inherent to preliminary
injunction practice.
Moderator
Kristine Boylan, Meagher & Geer, Minneapolis, MN
Speakers
Hon. Morton Denlow, Presiding Magistrate Judge, U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Chicago, IL
Hon. James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court for the
District of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
Edward G. Lance, Corporate Tradenark Counsel,
S.C. Johnson & Son,
Inc., Racine, WI
Craig S. Summers, Knobbe, Martens, Olsen & Bear,
LLP, Irvine, CA
Philip C. Swain, Foley Hoag, LLP, Boston, MA
Eric Lamison, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, San
Francisco, CA
IV Conflicts of Interest
and Ethics for the Intellectual Property Lawyers in the post-Enron
Era (ethics credit available)
Conflicts, confidentiality, proposed changes in the PTO ethics rules,
erosion of the attorney-client privilege and word product doctrine,
and the impact on IP lawyers of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
related regulations
Moderator
William Freivogel, Senior Vice President, Loss Prevention,
Aon Risk Services, Professional Services Group, Chicago, IL
Speakers
Barry E. Cohen, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington,
DC
David Hricik, Assistant Professor, Mercer University School of Law,
Macon, GA
Douglas R. Richmond, Senior Vice President, Aon Risk Services, Professional
Services Group, Chicago, IL
|
|
| |
12:00 noon – 1:30 p.m. |
|
BUFFET LUNCHEON (tickets required) |
|
|