 |

Section Represented at
International
Intellectual Property Rights Roundtable in China
The third annual Intellectual Property Rights Roundtable,
organized by the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, was held on January 13, 2005,
in Beijing, China. This annual event brought together over 250 government
officials and industry representatives from the United States, China,
Europe and Japan. Elizabeth Chien-Hale, the Chair of the Section’s
China Task Force, and Joseph Rogers, Section member and Intellectual
Property Director of Alcatel Shanghai Bell, attended the Roundtable
on behalf of the Section.
The high-level representatives from the U.S. government included Secretary
of Commerce Donald Evans and Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property Jon Dudas. The focus of the U.S. government’s position
remained on the transparency and efficiency of the existing system,
including improvement on criminal enforcement of intellectual property
rights. Secretary Evans emphasized that the U.S. government would like
to see results rather than process, and underscored three cases during
his luncheon keynote address: GM Daewoo suing China’s Chery for
automobile design similarities between GM’s Spark and Chery’s
QQ, Pfizer’s invalidated patent for its Viagra medication, and
the large quantity of counterfeit goods using NBA logos and trademarks
manufactured in China for sale in China and abroad. The industry representatives
discussed issues of general interest, such as market access, and more
industry-specific issues such as standards for the information technology
sector and data protection for the pharmaceutical industry. Representatives
from Europe and Japan also presented their views on the Chinese IP
system.
On the Chinese side, Vice-Premier Ms. Wu Yi provided a summary of activities
undertaken by the Chinese government to address the intellectual property
concerns of U.S. companies. First, the State Council has set up an
IPR Protection Working Group with Vice-Premier Wu as its director,
which coordinates 12 departments – including the Supreme People’s
Court, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, the Ministry of Commerce,
the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Industry
and Commerce, the National Copyright Office, the State Intellectual
Property Office, and the General Administration of Customs, among others – to
make concerted efforts on protecting intellectual property rights.
The working group, in addition to other initiatives, launched a specialized
campaign for IPR protection throughout China to identify priority areas
and major infringement cases. Furthermore, the Supreme People’s
Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate have jointly promulgated
the Interpretation on Several Issues Regarding the Application
of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Infringement on Intellectual Property
Rights. The drafters in the process consulted not only ministries within
the Chinese government, but also organizations such as the Business
Software Alliance, MPAA, and AmCham China. This new judicial interpretation
considerably readjusted the criteria for conviction and sentencing
of IP-related crimes, clarified ambiguous concepts and terms in the
IP infringement provisions of Chinese Criminal Law, and provided for
accomplice liability.
USPTO Director Jon Dudas called a separate meeting the next day between
industry representatives and Commerce Department personnel working
on China-related intellectual property issues to discuss how the USPTO
can offer technical assistance to reduce piracy and counterfeiting
in China. The USPTO currently provides assistance for administrative
process and the rule of law, office management, data exclusivity as
it relates to patents, improvements in the design patent system, protection
of well-known marks, and protection of intellectual property as it
relates to the use of the Internet. The USPTO has been granted $20
million for technical assistance to countries around the world, including
China, and information relating to technical assistance programs can
be found at the State Department’s website, at www.state.gov.
|
 |
|
 |