General Practice, Solo & Small Firm
DivisionMagazine
VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2 MARCH 2002
DOMESTIC RELATIONS LAW
When Remarriage Muddies the Waters
By Daniel N. Janich
You have completed your client's divorce and arranged for
entry of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO), which will
award her a portion of her ex-spouse's retirement benefits.
Sometime after the QDRO is entered, your client informs you that
the former spouse is remarrying and asks whether the QDRO will
continue to protect her interest in the retirement benefits after
he does. In response, you quickly pull your office file to review
once more the provisions of the QDRO. Whether your client's
interest in her ex-spouse's retirement benefits is adequately
protected may depend on whether she has been designated as the
"surviving spouse" in the QDRO.
Survivor benefit rules. Federal tax law governing qualified plans
provides an automatic survivor benefit requirement that applies
to qualified plans required to distribute benefits in the form of
a life annuity. Although this requirement does not apply to some
qualified plans, all qualified plans are nonetheless affected by
the rule. Under the survivor benefit rules, the participant's
current spouse at the time the participant retires or, if the
participant dies prior to retirement, as of the date of death is
deemed to be the participant's "surviving spouse." This
presumption is important in determining who is entitled to
receive the balance of the participant's retirement benefits upon
his death. If the participant is remarried at the time of
retirement or, if earlier, at his death, his former spouse will
not be entitled to receive these benefits, absent a clear
designation of the former spouse as the "surviving spouse" in a
QDRO. Therefore, a QDRO may rebut the current spouse presumption
if it expressly provides that a former spouse shall retain rights
as the surviving spouse.
Automatic survivor benefit requirements are found in the federal
tax rules governing the distribution of qualified plan benefits
in the form of a life annuity. To have a complete understanding
of the survivor benefit rules, a divorce attorney preparing a
QDRO must also understand how the particular retirement benefits
affected by the QDRO are to be distributed.
Pension plans, money purchase, and target benefit plans are
required by law to distribute a married participant's accrued
retirement benefits in the form of a qualified joint and survivor
annuity (QJSA), which pays benefits over the joint lives of the
participant and surviving spouse. If a married participant should
die before retirement benefits become payable, i.e., the "annuity
starting date," the surviving spouse would then receive periodic
payments for life in the form of a qualified preretirement
survivor annuity (QPSA). An unmarried participant of these plans
would receive accrued retirement benefits in the form of a single
life annuity that provides periodic payments until the
participant's death.
Profit sharing and stock bonus plans are not required to offer a
life annuity form of distribution; therefore, the survivor
benefit rules generally would not apply in such cases. But these
plans must provide that, absent consent of the surviving spouse
to the designation of another beneficiary, upon the participant's
death the participant's retirement benefit is payable in full to
the participant's surviving spouse.
When designated in a QDRO, a former spouse is treated as the
surviving spouse for all purposes relating to the participant's
retirement plan. Thus, a former spouse who is so designated will
be required to consent to a form of distribution other than the
QJSA or to a participant's waiver of the QPSA in cases where the
plan requires those forms of distribution for married
participants. As stated previously, in plans that are not subject
to QJSA and QPSA requirements, a former spouse who is treated as
the surviving spouse is entitled to consent to the payment of the
participant's retirement benefits to another designated
beneficiary.
Drafting QDROs. Some divorce lawyers mistakenly assume that a
plan administrator's approval of a proposed QDRO will ensure that
all issues important to the client have been adequately
addressed. However, a valid QDRO may, and often does, fail to
address the impact of the divorce on the former spouse's right to
receive benefits as the surviving spouse under the qualified
retirement plan. Unfortunately, failure to include a survivorship
provision in the QDRO often goes undetected until the participant
dies or retires, the survivor benefits irrevocably vest in the
current spouse, and it is too late to do anything about it.
Courts have ruled that a former spouse who had not been
designated a surviving spouse in the QDRO was not entitled to
further benefits after the plan participant died, and that the
QDRO could not be amended after the participant's death. Courts
also have ruled that a QDRO for the survivor annuity portion of a
retirement benefit could not be created in favor of the
participant's first spouse when the participant had remarried and
started receiving retirement benefits in the form of a
QJSA.
Divorce attorneys should realize that the designation of a former
spouse as the surviving spouse in a QDRO is simply a matter for
negotiation and agreement by the participant and the former
spouse. A former spouse designated as surviving spouse under a
QDRO may receive as much or as little protection as the parties
agree upon, extending surviving spouse treatment to a former
spouse for all or some of the participant's benefits under the
plan.
In fact, IRS Notice 97-11 provides that a former spouse may be
treated as the surviving spouse with respect to benefits accrued
through the date of divorce or with respect to all benefits
accrued through the participant's retirement. Where the former
spouse is treated as the surviving spouse for benefits accrued
through the date of divorce, both the former spouse and the
current spouse enjoy survivor annuity protection, including the
right to consent to the designation of another beneficiary.
Unless one of the surviving spouses later waives the benefit, on
the participant's death the plan would pay two survivor annuities
based on the life span of each spouse, the total amount of which
would not exceed (on an actuarially equivalent basis) the amount
payable to one surviving spouse. When the former spouse is
treated as the surviving spouse with respect to benefits accrued
through the participant's retirement date, a subsequent spouse of
the participant would be denied spousal protection under the
survivor benefit rules.
In our opening scenario, we left the divorce attorney as he was
examining the QDRO. At this juncture, divorce counsel should
first determine whether the former spouse was clearly identified
as a surviving spouse in the QDRO. If not, counsel must determine
whether the parties agreed to designate the former spouse as the
surviving spouse. Once an agreement on this issue is reached, the
QDRO should be promptly amended to specifically designate the
former spouse as the surviving spouse before the plan participant
either dies (prior to retirement) or retires (following
remarriage).
Agreement by parties. When preparing a QDRO, divorce counsel
should always ascertain whether the parties have agreed to
designate the former spouse as the surviving spouse for survivor
benefit purposes with regard to some or all of the participant's
retirement benefits. If the parties in their property settlement
discussions have not addressed the matter, they should come to an
agreement before the QDRO is entered with the court. Ideally, the
proposed QDRO would include the appropriate language before it is
submitted to the plan administrator for final approval before
entry with the court.
In any event, due to the potential malpractice risk divorce
attorneys face if this issue is not timely addressed, counsel for
the former spouse should include this issue on a QDRO checklist,
routinely raising it before completing the QDRO to adequately
protect the client's interest in the participant's preretirement
and postretirement benefits from the reach of the participant's
current spouse.
Daniel N. Janich is an employee benefits partner in the law firm of Freeborn & Peters in Chicago, Illinois.
This article is an abridged and edited version of one that
originally appeared on page 39 of Family Advocate, Fall 2001
(24:2).



