Volume 19, Number 5
July/August 2002
Advance Directives:
Ten Topics to Discuss with Clients
By Robert Fleming and Rebecca C. Morgan
Regardless of the type of practice, any lawyer who has long-term clients, or elderly relatives for that matter, should know something about advance directives, guardianships, and nursing homes. Here are answers to ten questions elder law attorneys frequently hear from their clients and families.
- An advance directive is only as good as the
family's willingness to honor it. There is no
guarantee that a client's advance directive will be honored. In
addition to the careful work of the lawyer in drafting the
documents, the client must take steps to improve the chances
that the family and health care providers will honor the
directive. Most state statutes do not have provisions for civil
actions to enforce directives, and many are not honored, for a
variety of reasons.
- Having a conversation with family about end-of-life
wishes and reasons for them gives the client the best chance of
getting a directive honored. The best thing the client
can do to increase the likelihood her wishes will be honored
and her directive followed is to have conversations with those
who will be involved in her end-of-life care-her family, health
care provider, and spiritual advisor. An explanation why she
chose a particular course of action will help the family
understand her motivation and increase the likelihood that her
family will honor it. To help the client outline such a
conversation, the ABA Commission on Legal Problems of the
Elderly offers lawyers a Tool Kit, available at
www.abanet.org/elderly/orderingpage.html#toolkit.
- The client and the surrogate decision maker must
discuss the client's wishes. The advance directive
directs the surrogate to make the decision as the client would
have made it. If, however, the surrogate is not clear about the
client's wishes, the surrogate ends up making a decision about
what is in the client's best interest instead of what the
client would want.
- If the client lives in more than one state, it may
be advisable to have a directive from each state.
Enforceability of a directive from one state to another remains
problematic. Although all 50 states and the District of
Columbia have statutes creating written directives, these vary.
Generally, a directive valid in the state in which it is made
should be honored in another state. If the client lives in more
than one state, the easiest solution may be for the client to
prepare a directive from each state.
- A client may need a pre-hospital "do not
resuscitate" order separate from the client's advance
directive. Many states provide, either by statute or
administrative regulation, a separate document for a
pre-hospital do-not-resuscitate order (DNRO), which often
contains specific language or must be on a certain color of
paper. If the pre-hospital DNRO does not meet the state's
requirements, it will not be honored by emergency services
personnel. States requiring a separate pre-hospital DNRO would
not accept a general statement in the client's advance
directive that she does not want to be resuscitated in the
event of a medical emergency.
- Guardianship should be viewed as a last resort;
good planning can eliminate its need in most cases.
Elderly people value their personal independence, just like
their younger counterparts. They are often afraid to ask for
help or report being financially exploited for fear of engaging
a system that could ultimately result in institutionalization
and/or guardianship. Good estate planning in many cases can
avoid guardianship. If the client has a trust in place, has
delegated health care decision-making authority to another, and
has appointed a trusted individual to serve as attorney in fact
under a durable power of attorney for property management, the
client might avoid being the subject of a guardianship
proceeding.
- Old age alone is not a basis for declaring a person
incapacitated-elderly people may make unwise decisions yet
remain competent. Being old is not a sufficient ground
for declaring a person incapacitated. Nor is it sufficient if
an adult child disagrees with the elderly parent's lifestyle
choices. Although grounds for an incapacity finding vary by
state, they are usually summarized as an inability to manage
one's property or care for oneself to the point that harm may
occur.
- Guardianships are vehicles to help, not financially
exploit, an individual. The fact that the client plans to leave
her money to the child at her death does not give the
child/guardian a license to spend it for the child's needs now
(or to hoard it to protect the inheritance). Every
guardian-including a child-has a fiduciary obligation to the
ward and to the court. Plans to leave assets to a child do not
give the child/guardian authority to use those assets for the
child's personal needs. The money must be spent on the parent's
care; if the funds are exhausted in the process, the child
simply may not receive an inheritance.
- There are good nursing homes and bad nursing homes.
Clients need to do their homework to figure out which facility
will be best. Few people hope to end up in a nursing
home, but it is a fact of life in American society that many
elderly people will be institutionalized at some point. In
fact, estimates are that about half of those 65 years old will
spend at least some time in a nursing home. Choosing a nursing
home can be a particularly emotional experience for all
concerned. A lawyer can help by giving the client a frame of
reference for selecting the home. Each facility is inspected
annually by federal and state governments and the state's
ombudsman program. The results of these inspections can be
useful in determining which facility is best for the relative's
needs. A conversation with the local ombudsman will give the
client a good feel for a facility's reputation. Although the
Medicare website has Nursing Home Compare, a searchable
database of facilities, the database currently contains only
information from annual inspections, not findings from
complaint investigations. Caution clients against relying
heavily on the information on Nursing Home Compare until this
is corrected.
- Long-term nursing home care is very expensive. Despite what many people believe, most nursing home care is not covered by Medicare, which provides very limited short-term coverage for care in nursing homes only in certain situations. Personal coverage for long-term care is designed to cover options like nursing homes. A variety of policies are available, but many people continue to postpone signing up for such coverage. Although Medicaid does cover nursing home care, it has strict income and resource guidelines. Because it is difficult to qualify for long-term Medicaid coverage, it is important for clients to investigate the availability of insurance, decide whether they can pay for care without assistance, and/or consider the likelihood that they will need to apply for Medicaid in the foreseeable future.
Parents as Clients
End-of-life arrangements are difficult in any situation, but they
become more difficult when the decision involves a member of your
family or your own parent. Guardianship and nursing home issues
usually occur in a crisis, compounding already difficult
emotions. Family dynamics and prior promises make it difficult to
implement responsible decisions. As life expectancies lengthen,
every attorney will encounter these matters in practice or
personal life. When it is personal, it sometimes is better to let
another attorney handle the situation. Involving an attorney with
experience in elder law issues not only improves the quality of
legal advice, it also lets you be your parent's child.
Robert Fleming is an attorney in private practice in
Tucson, Arizona, with the firm of Fleming & Curti, PLC.
Rebecca C. Morgan is a distinguished professor of law at Stetson
College of Law in St. Petersburg,
Florida.



