Volume 19, Number 3
April/May 2002
From the Editor
The Flavor of Solo
By jennifer j. rose
I wanted to be a solo practitioner right out of law school,
purely because I wanted my name in lights. (And I knew it was
highly unlikely that I'd ever be a name partner if I joined Baker
& McKenzie.) Oh, there were other considerations, too, like
having my own corner office with a window, wearing whatever I
wanted to the office, and selecting my letterhead. Well, there
was another reason: I didn't want to share what I earned with
anyone else, even if I only earned peanuts my first year in
practice.
Nixon was still in office when I started law school, and just
about the only classmates openly headed toward small firm
practices were those scions whose fathers and grandfathers were
expecting them back at the old home firm in places like Storm
Lake, Iowa; or the wild, errant, and independent souls who never
had played well with others in the sandbox. Setting up shop solo
while the ink on the diploma was still fresh was considered the
mark of more guts than brains. "Not a team player" was a common
scoff pitched at solos. You know the look-a blend of incredulity,
pity, and envy.
Today solo and small firm practitioners still are a lot like
Baskin-Robbins, featuring all those different flavors-from those
practicing probate in a home office to securities lawyers in New
York City skyscrapers. Some truly do practice all alone, and some
have extensive support staff. And the reasons for practicing in a
solo or small firm setting are just as varied as the
practitioners themselves.
Some enjoy the hands-on approach of all aspects of the practice,
handling marketing to billing and combining the entrepreneurial
aspects of running a business with the nuts and bolts of
practicing law. Others find the flexibility, intimacy, and lack
of hierarchy the true drawing card of solo and small firm
practice. More lawyers than ever are establishing solo practices
straight out of law school, as well as during transitions from
larger firms and public employment. But they all share one common
denominator: They're the managing partner, the name partner, the
rainmaker, and the one who performs the work. One-dimensional
they're not.
The ABA General Practice, Solo & Small Firm Division evolved
from the generic General Practice Section, which had sort of
lurked under the unspoken code of "general practice or solo and
small firm or something in between" for a long time before coming
out of the closet in 1994. Long before that, sometime in the
early '80s (the exact date of which remains beyond the recall of
those of us with short memories), the Section presented a
three-hour program during the Annual Meeting specifically
addressing the needs of solo and small firm practitioners. By
1989, Solo Day grew into a half-day program resembling a town
hall meeting; it became a longer and more demonstrative program,
segmented from the Annual Meeting, in 1997, showcasing the most
relevant, important, and cutting-edge issues facing solo and
small firm practitioners. Solo Day 2002 will prove that it's
possible to improve upon perfection. More information about Solo
Day 2002 is headed your way-check the ad on page 1 and Section
News on page 10 for specifics.
This issue of GPSolo brings to you the best of Solo Day
programs-a road map and tool kit for all readers, whether they're
brand new, seasoned, transitional, or not even in solo practice.
I simply love to hear readers who aren't part of the target
audience-large firm practitioners or spouses of Section
members-report on the benefits they reap from GPSolo.
Judy Toyer, the editor of this issue, was a solo in Rochester,
New York, when the work began on this issue, and now she's
Counsel, Employment Law and Personnel Relations Legal Staff, at
Eastman Kodak. All of the credit for organizing this stellar
issue of GPSolo belongs to her.
jennifer j. rose, editor-in-chief of GPSolo,
is a lawyer and writer, living in Morelia, Michaocan, Mexico,
after two decades practicing as a solo in Iowa. She can be
reached at jenniferrose@abanet.org.



