Abstracts
Vol. 38, No. 3, Fall 2004
Symposium on International Law
Barbara Stark, Introduction: Practical Applications and Critical
Perspectives in International Family Law, 38 FAM. L.Q. 475 (2004).
This article introduces the Family Law Quarterly 2004 Symposium on
International Law, which reflects two trends: (1) the emergence of
human rights questions that have come to the fore in family law cases,
as noted in virtually all of the articles in this issue and (2) growing
efforts to coordinate and harmonize divergent, often competing, systems
have exposed the increasing complexity of international family law
and the growing need for practical guidance such as that offered by
contributors to this issue.
Berta Esperanza Hernandez-Truyol, Asking the Family Question, 38
FAM. L.Q. 481 (2004).
This article proposes a fundamental shift in the approach to international
policy and law-making as well as the engagement of international relations,
to include a family-sensitive, culturally inclusive, and socially
friendly perspective. The author urges that a key component to all
international norm-making and relations be the asking of the family
question.
Ann Laquer Estin, Toward a Multicultural Family Law, 38 FAM. L.Q.
501 (2004).
This article reviews areas in which cultural and religious accommodation
has become an issue in private family law disputes, and examines:
(1) what happens when courts extend recognition and respect to marriages,
divorces, and custody decrees that originate within a particular tradition
and that differ from the more familiar legal culture; (2) how courts
respond to cases that raise questions of religious law or practice;
and (3) courts' accommodations that demonstrate the importance of
incorporating issues of diversity into the larger framework of fundamental
values.
Carol S. Bruch, The Unmet Needs of Domestic Violence Victims and
Their Children in Hague Child Abduction Convention Cases, 38 FAM.
L.Q. 529 (2004).
Professor Bruch reviews cases under the 1980 Hague Convention on the
Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction that return children
to their habitual residences even when valid defenses to return have
been established. She concludes that the Convention does not support
their reasoning and that they needlessly endanger children and domestic
violence victims. Finally, she recommends a return to the original
structure and purposes of the Convention as a means to alleviate these
difficulties.
D. Marianne Blair, International Application of the UCCJEA: Scrutinizing
the Escape Clause, 38 FAM. L.Q. 547 (2004).
This article surveys the various sources of law in U.S. courts
that impact choice of forum, recognition, and enforcement in international
custody disputes. It also focuses specifically on UCCJEA Section 105,
which controls the international application of the act, and examines
arguments for expansive interpretation of the "escape clause,"
when to do otherwise would create a credible risk of harm to a parent
or child. The article ends with a discussion of scenarios in which
the UCCJEA could otherwise undermine defenses in the Hague Abduction
Convention, as well as provisions that support a more expansive interpretation.
Merle H. Weiner, Using Article 20, 38 FAM. L.Q. 583 (2004).
This is a companion piece to the author's previous article,Strengthening
Article 20. In this article, the author sets forth the article 20
defense that a domestic violence victim might make if she were a respondent
to a Hague petition in the United States. For a history of article
20 and its defenses, see Strengthening Article 20.
Nancy G. Maxwell & Caroline J. Forder, The Inadequacies in
U.S. and Dutch Adoption Law to Establish Same-Sex Couples as Legal
Parents: A Call for Recognizing Intentional Parenthood, 38 FAM. L.Q.
623 (2004).
This article analyzes the legal inadequacies in U.S. law to protect
the parent-child relationship between a child and his or her co-parent
when same-gender couples raise children together. This situation is
compared to the development in Dutch law, which is more expansive
than U.S. law in granting protection to a child's relationship with
a co-parent; however, it is demonstrated that the Dutch provisions
are inconsistent. The article strives to provide a coherent solution
by the endorsement of the concept of intentional parenthood. That
concept, the authors argue, provides a solution in both countries
to protect the social and emotional reality of children brought up
by same-gender parents, which is that they do, indeed, have two parents.
William Duncan, The Development of the New Hague Convention on
the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family
Maintenance, 38 FAM. L.Q. 663 (2004).
This article explains background negotiations and objectives of
the new Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support
and Other Forms of Family Maintenance. It draws on a number of reports
and preliminary documents drawn up by the author preliminary to or
in preparation for negotiations.
Marcia Yablon, The Indian Child Welfare Act Amendments of 2003,
38 FAM. L.Q. 689 (2004).
This article, the first-place winner of the 2004 Howard C. Schwab
Essay Contest, analyzes the potential impact of a number of proposed
amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act. The author argues that
if adopted, these amendments would significantly improve application
of the ICWA by clarifying many of the issues that have caused disagreement
among counts. The author believes that a glaring omission in the amendments
is a reference to the controversy over the "existing Indian family
doctrine."
Alyssa Rower, The Legality of Polygamy: Using the Due Process
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, 38 FAM. L.Q. 711 (2004).
This article, the second-place winner of the 2004 Howard C. Schwab
Essay Contest, examines the validity of a challenge to anti-polygamy
statutes through the Due Process Clause. The author begins with a
discussion of the social and legal history of polygamy in the United
States, and concludes with a discussion of the implications of the
Lawrence decision and the social and public policy implications of
legalizing polygamy.
Matthew J. Astle, An Ounce of Prevention: Marital Counseling Laws
as an Anti-Divorce Measure, 38 FAM. L.Q. 733 (2004).
This article examines the recent trend of state premarital and
pre-divorce counseling laws, comparing them favorably to covenant
marriage laws as an effort to curb escalating divorce rates. The author
compares the many different counseling laws, which vary widely in
their provisions from state to state, and argues that the most effective
ones provide real incentives for couples to think seriously about
making their marriage work both before it starts and before it ends.
The author responds to potential constitutional challenges to counseling
laws and analyzes their effectiveness from a policy standpoint.
Publication Date: January 2005
Family Law Quarterly
Board of Editors
Linda D. Elrod
Associate Editor
Robert G. Spector
Board of Editors
Jeff Atkinson
Elizabeth B. Brandt
Jean N. Crowe
John DeWitt Gregory
Robert J. Levy
J. Thomas Oldham
John J. Sampson
Nancy Ver Steegh
Reviewing Editors
Susan Appleton
Patricia M. Hoff
Harry D. Krause
Paul M. Kurtz
Managing Editor
Deborah Eisel
2006-2007 Student Editorial Staff
Washburn University School of Law
Student Editor-In-Chief
Holly Fisher
Student Executive Research Editors
Christine Campbell
Megan Fluharty
Tracey Johnson
Student Senior Editors
Melissa Doolan
Kyle Ramsey
Derik Smith
Catherine Sundwall
Doug Taylor
Eryn Wright
Katherine Zluticky
Student Junior Editors
Lucy Betteridge
Jessica Casterline
Lauren Douglass
Regan Duckworth
Megan Furgason
Nicholas (Craig) Hovarth
Sayra Hurley
Jessica Kohls
Anna Krstulic
Carol Krstulic
Audrey Lee
William Schmidt
Brandy Smidt
Amy Turner
Jason Watkins
Katie Whitsitt
Secretarial Staff
Pamela Arnoldy
Shirley Jacobson




