Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources
Sustainable Development, Ecosystems, and Climate Change Committee - Newsletter Archive
Vol. 6, No. 2 - April 2003
Kyoto Protocol Updates
Donald Goldberg
Center for International Environmental Law
The CDM Executive Board has held eight meetings to continue to develop rules for the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Issues currently under discussions include accreditation of operational entities, methodologies for baselines and monitoring, and registration of projects. A particularly contentious issue has been the definition of additionality. Environmentalists claim that credited projects must be additional; that is, free-rider credits to projects that would have happened anyway should be avoided. Many businesses, however, and some countries have expressed an opposing view. They believe credit should be available as long as emissions with the project are lower than emissions would be without the project. The why of the project is irrelevant, they argue.
No new text has been developed on sinks since Marrakesh, though there have been workshops on technical issues. Some key issues will be taken up at the next subsidiary body meeting in June, however, and are expected to be resolved at COP9. To be decided are the rule for permanence and definitions of afforestation and reforestation in the CDM. Two competing approaches for resolving the permanence issue are ton year accounting, which would assign a certain amount of credit for each year that the sink remains standing, and Temporary CERs (Certified Emissions Reductions), which would create credits that expire after a given time and must be replaced either by a permanent or new temporary CER. Some Parties may seek sinks rules for baselines, additionality, leakage, and environmental and socio-economic criteria, but others likely will oppose any refinement of existing rules.
Entry into force still hinges on Russia. As of March, 106 states, representing 43.9 percent of Annex I emissions, had ratified or acceded to the Protocol. The Protocol has a dual threshold for entry into force. A minimum of 55 countries must ratify or accede to the Protocol, and ratifying and acceding Parties must represent at least 55 percent of Annex I emissions. At this point, ratification by the Russian Federation would meet all criteria for entry into force. Russia announced its intention to ratify at last years World Summit on Sustainable Development, but has not yet done so.
Sustainable Dev Navigation
Use Limitations of This Periodical
Viewers of this periodical may print one copy of this issue for personal use only. Requests for all other uses of this periodical should be directed to the Manager, Copyrights & Licensing, American Bar Association, e-mail: copyright@abanet.org; fax: 312/988-6030.
© 2008. American Bar Association. All rights reserved. The views expressed herein have not been approved by the ABA House of Delegates or the Board of Governors and, accordingly should not be construed as representing the policy of the ABA.
This newsletter is a publication of the ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, and reports on the activities of the committee. All persons interested in joining the Section or one of its committees should contact the Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, American Bar Association, 321 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654.


