ABA Criminal Justice Section White Collar Crime Committee Newsletter

White Collar Crime Committee Newsletter

February 2008

 Book Review

 

Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts, Second Edition:

A Treatise for Federal Criminal Practitioners

 

by Stephen D. Miller

 

 

Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts (2nd ed. 2005) Robert L. Haig, editor-in-chief.

 

            Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts (2nd Edition) could have been titled “Civil and Criminal Litigation in Federal Courts.”  This fine treatise was written primarily for federal commercial practitioners, but it is a valuable resource for federal criminal practitioners as well.  In fact, the eight volumes of BCL cover a wide spectrum of procedural issues facing criminal practitioners in the preindictment, pretrial, and trial stages of a federal criminal case.

 

            Two chapters offer valuable guidance in the investigatory and preindictment stages:  Investigation of the Case (Chapter 4) and Discovery Strategy and Privileges (Chapter 19).  BCL contains practical tips on how to select a qualified and licensed investigator, and how best to draft a retainer agreement with an investigator or other consultants, such as accountants, so that their work may be protected by the attorney-client and work product privileges.  A form model retainer agreement is included in the practice aids section of Chapter 4.[1]  Of great value to a practitioner’s investigation is the section describing the use of the internet to access information about a company, its business, and its officers and directors.  Search engines such as Google, Yahoo, Lexis-Nexis, Company Sleuth, and Public Record Finders are identified so that a wide variety of information about persons and corporations can be accessed on the internet.  Such information includes social security numbers, dates of birth, use of aliases, criminal records, bankruptcy filings, interests in real estate, vehicle ownership, and driving records.  Pacer permits access to pleadings and records of United States District Bankruptcy and Appellate Courts.  The forensics section contains an interesting discussion of private sting operations, polygraphs, and trash examinations.[2]

 

            Chapter 19, entitled “Discovery Strategy and Privileges”, discusses the various privileges that may be asserted by a defense lawyer in an effort to defeat the Government’s efforts to secure information in its investigation.  It has become common for the Government to attempt to pierce attorney-client communications by alleging that they fall within the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege.  The showing that must be demonstrated by the proponent of crime-fraud is discussed and applicable cases cited.

 

            Opinion work product is entitled to significantly higher protection from disclosure than ordinary work product.  Chapter 19 points out that a memorandum of a witness interview prepared by a lawyer which embodies the lawyer’s insights about the characteristics of the witness and how his testimony would fit into the case constitutes the opinions, mental impressions, and conclusions of the lawyer, and should be accorded a significantly higher level of protection from disclosure to the Government.  This chapter also discusses the preparation of privilege logs, the necessity for providing sufficient identifying information yet not with such detail that the privilege sought to be protected would be invaded.

 

            Use of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §552 (“FOIA”), to secure helpful information from the Government outside of the regular discovery procedures provided for by the Federal Rules of Criminal and Civil Procedure are included in Chapter 19 as well.

 

            Crucial to a criminal defendant’s trial strategy is the determination of whether in limine motions should be filed in advance of trial.  A primary objective of the in limine motion is to avoid prejudice at trial by having the Court decide in advance whether particular evidence that the Government wishes to offer is, in fact, admissible.  Chapter 32 (motions in limine) discusses the legal basis and strategy for filing “relevance” motions under Federal R. Evid. 402 and motions authorized by Federal R. Evid. 403 which allows a litigant to attempt to exclude evidence, even if relevant, if the unfair prejudice, waste of time, or jury confusion substantially outweighs the practical value of the evidence.  This chapter warns that an opposing party may seek to offer inadmissible hearsay before the jury through expansive expert testimony.  Thus, an in limine motion should be considered to limit the scope of expert testimony to avoid such prejudice.

 

            BCL’s Volumes 3 and 4 contain four informative chapters concerning the trial of a case:  Opening statements, cross examination, expert witnesses, and closing arguments in jury and bench trials.

 

            Of interest both to younger, less experienced lawyers as well as experienced advocates is Chapter 34, concerning opening statements.  The language used in an opening statement should be simple and expressive and told in narrative form, like an interesting story:

 

“Oral storytelling is much different from written storytelling.  The oral form is three-dimensional.  In addition to the literary content, the personality, the presence, and the mannerisms of the teller are included.  Facial expressions, physical gestures, voice characteristics, modulations, and many other things go into the process.”[3]

 

            Chapter 36 discusses cross-examination.  It begins with the question of whether cross-examination of a given witness should be considered at all, and then provides several examples of effective Impeaching Cross Examinations.  The chapter concludes with the wise advice that “cross-examination is an art based upon induction and personality and honed hopefully to perfection by “Extended Courtroom Experiences.”

 

            A ranging discussion of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) is found in Chapter 80.  The question of what constitutes a RICO enterprise is frequently at issue in RICO criminal litigation.  A good discussion of the proposition that an association-in-fact enterprise must have a structure and an ongoing legitimate purpose that is different from a group that is joined together solely to violate RICO is clearly set out.

 

            Chapter 59 discusses ethical issues in commercial cases.  As in the chapters discussed earlier, there is much that applies with equal force in a criminal case.  There are discussions of conflicts of interest, withdrawal, and joint defense agreements.  The pros and cons of whether the lawyer can appear as an advocate in the case if he is likely to be a witness is fully explored.

 

            The editor-in-chief of this fine treatise is Robert L. Haig, an outstanding litigator and legal scholar, who is a partner with the law firm of Kelley, Drye & Warren, LLP in New York.  199 principal authors, including 17 federal judges, have authored the 96 chapters of BCL.  Included with the treatise is a CD-ROM which contains checklists, forms, and jury instructions that are found in the printed volumes.

 

            BCL is a valuable resource for all lawyers who practice in the federal courts, whether their focus is civil or criminal, and whether they are older and experienced or younger and in need of reliable information and advice.

 

 

 

 

 



[1] BCL’s 96 chapters contain helpful “how to” checklists, work sheets, and model documents.

[2] Importantly, the lawfulness, risks, and admissibility of the results of these activities are discussed and relevant cases cited.

[3] DeCof, Opening Statements, Excellence in Advocacy (1992).