Jump to Navigation | Jump to Content



STATUS OF NON-RESIDENT FATHERS IN CHILD WELFARE


Click here to download the PDF version | Click here to download the Microsoft Word Version

Father Absenteeism

Today more American children are growing up without their biological father in the home than at any other point in American history. Trends such as divorce and remarriage, as well as more children being born outside of marriage, result in a diminishing role of fathers in the daily lives of their children. Over twenty-five million American children (or 33.5 percent of children in the U.S.) live absent their biological father. (Krieder, 2005).

National changes in children’s living arrangements have also caused a shift in the traditional paradigm of the mother, father, and child household. Of the 73.2 million children under 18 years old living in the United States in 2004, 67.7 percent (49.6 million) were living with two parents, 27.9 percent (20.4 million) were living with a single parent, and 4.3 percent (3.1 million) were living with neither parent. (U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Father Facts: Fifth Edition, a publication from the National Fatherhood Initiative in 2007, discusses how these living situations may impact children:

  • Compared to living with both parents, living in a single-parent home doubles the risk that a child will suffer physical, emotional, or educational neglect. (America’s Children, 1997).
  • Analyzing a group of 8th graders who initially resided with both biological parents, children in households that had experienced a change in family structure had school dropout rates two to three times higher than peers whose families did not change. (Pong, 2000).
  • Children in father absent homes are five times more likely to be poor. In 2002, 7.8 percent of children in married-couple families were living in poverty, compared to 38.4 percent of children in female-only households. (U.S. Census Bureau, 2003).
A number of studies also suggest that non-resident fathers present a unique population that requires special consideration:
  • About half of all non-custodial fathers have ties to another set of kin and a quarter have three or more kids in their lives. These children include non-resident biological children of all other past/present mates, biological children and stepchildren who may reside with the father, and step children who live elsewhere. Eight percent of all non-resident fathers are living with biological children they fathered prior to their current residency and another 26 percent live with stepchildren. About 14 percent of non-resident fathers are living with women who are also nonresident parents, and 42 percent have biological children with their current spouse or partner. (Manning, 2003).
  • For post-divorce, non-resident fathers, lower levels of involvement with their children are related to ongoing conflict with the residential mother, greater geographical distance from the children, and a lack of clarity regarding the nature of the fathering role. (Leite, 2002).
The Urban Institute’s National Survey of America’s Families (NSAF) provides additional information, generally, on children’s living arrangements. NSAF data from 2001 shows that half of children living in families whose income is below the federal poverty line live with their mothers, but not their fathers. However, NSAF data shows that minor gains were made in terms of the number of those children who received child support. Thirty-six percent of those children received support payments in 2001 compared to 31 percent in 1996. The Urban Institute notes that although these are statistically significant gains, over 60 percent of poor children do not receive child support from their fathers who live outside the home. (Sorenson, 2003).

Non-Resident Fathers and Child Welfare Systems

Father absence is also common in the child welfare system. When multiple children are system-involved, there is a high frequency of cases that involve multiple non-resident fathers. Sometimes fathers are unknown or legal paternity has not been established. Moreover, available statistics show that a large percentage of children in the foster system have non-resident fathers.

According to the Adoption Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) data, on September 30, 2005, there were 513,000 children placed in foster care within the United States. Other data and research indicates that most foster children are not living with their fathers at the time they are removed from their homes. An incalculable number of children and youth also enter the child welfare system but are not removed from the home; many of them also have non-resident fathers who live outside the home.

Data collected by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for Child Maltreatment 2005 shows that child abuse and/or neglect victims came from single parent, mother only households more often than any other living arrangement type. Moreover, of the 28 states reporting, 11.1 percent of child victims of abuse, neglect or abandonment were from married parent households, while 17.7 percent of victims came from mother only households and 1.9 percent of victims came from father only households.

A 2005 report assessing National Child Abuse and Neglect System (NCANDS) data from 2002, showed that females outnumbered male perpetrators among cases investigated by child welfare agencies by approximately 10 percent. The study also found that more than half of male perpetrators were biological fathers but almost one quarter were father figures, such as stepfathers or mothers’ boyfriends. These statistics regarding perpetrators also support data showing that child maltreatment victims frequently have fathers who live outside the home.

Moreover, although paternity is known for more than 80 percent of foster children with non-resident fathers and for other children served by child welfare agencies, once in foster care they have little contact with their fathers. In November 2003, the Urban Institute issued a brief on Getting Noncustodial Dads Involved in the Lives of Foster Children. (Malm, 2003). That brief noted:

  • Only 54 percent of foster children had contact with their fathers in the past year;
  • 66 percent of comparable children served by child welfare agencies had contact with their fathers in the past year; and
  • 72 percent of children in the general population had contact with their fathers in the past year.

References

The AFCARS Report: Preliminary Estimates for Fiscal Year 2005 as of September 2006.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children's Bureau, 2006.

America’s Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being. Table SPECIAL1. Washington, D.C.: Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics, 1997.

Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare (CASCW), CASCW Practice Notes, The Fatherhood Factor in Permanency Planning, Practice Notes, Issue No. 15, March 2004.

Krieder, Rose M. and Jason Fields. Living Arrangements of Children: 2001. Current Population Reports, p. 70-104. Table 1. Washington, DC.: US Census Bureau, 2005.

Leite, Randall W. and Patrick C. McKenry. “Aspects of Father Status and Post divorce Father Involvement with Children.” Journal of Family Issues, 23 (July 2002): 601-623.

Male Perpetrators of Child Maltreatment: Findings from NCANDS. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, 2005.

Malm, Karin. “Getting Noncustodial Dads Involved in the Lives of Foster Children.” Caring for Children: Facts and Perspectives Brief No. 3, November 2003.

The Lewin Group, Inc., An Evaluability Assessment of Responsible Fatherhood Programs: Final Report, August 1997.

Manning, Wendy D., Susan D. Stuart and Pamela J. Smock. “The Complexity of Fathers Parenting Responsibilities and Involvement with Nonresident Children.” Journal of Family Issues, 24 (July 2003): 645-667.

National Child Welfare Resource Center for Family Centered Practice, Best Practice/Next Practice, Summer, 2002.

National Family Preservation Network (NFPN), An Assessment of Child Welfare Practices Regarding Fathers 2001.

National Fatherhood Initiative (NFI). Father Facts: Fifth Edition, 2007.

Pong, Suet-Ling, and Dong-Beom Ju. “The Effects of Change in Family Structure and Income on Dropping Out of Middle and High School.” Journal of Family Issues 21 (March 2000): 147-169

U.S. Census Bureau. America’s Families and Living Arrangements. Current Population Reports, P.20-553. Table C3. Washington, D.C., U.S. Census Bureau, 2004.

U.S. Census Bureau. Current Population Survey Reports. “Household Relationship and Living Arrangements of Children Under 18 Years, by Age, Sex, Race, Hispanic Origin: 2004; All Races, White only, Black only, and Hispanic only.” Table C2. Published July 29, 2005.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. Child Maltreatment 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2007. (Data source: Child File).

U.S. Census Bureau. Children’s Living Arrangements and Characteristics: March 2002, P20-547, Table C3. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 2003.

Sorenson, Elaine. “Child Support Gains Some Ground” in Snaphots3 of America’s Families. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 2003.

Back to Top