|
Attorney
By
Attorney
Career
Profiles of the Profession
Who?
David Marx, Jr
Partner
What?
Primary Practice Area & Subspecialty Fields:
Antitrust and Trade Regulation--litigation and counseling.
When?
In Practice Area:
Since 1977
In the Legal Profession:
Since 1975
Where?
|
Employer:
McDermott, Will & Emery
www.mwe.com
Size/Sector:
Over 900 lawyers
City/State:
Chicago, IL
|
Law School:
Syracuse University College of Law
Undergraduate School/Degree:
Amherst College, 1972, B.A.
|
Why?
Pluses/Challenges of Practice Area:
Diversified practice with the opportunity to learn more than one
ever wanted to know about a variety of industries and businesses.
It mixes the practice of law with economics and business and requires
not just advocacy but creative problem solving. The mix of litigation
and counseling allow for both intellectual creativity and the
development of courtroom skills. Additionally, the litigation
experience influences one's approach to counseling.
Core Skills/Key Knowledge Needed in Your Practice Area:
A knowledge of economics, basic business, and litigation.
Advice to Lawyers and Law Students Interested in Your Practice
Area:
Time spent with the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice
or the Federal Trade Commission is a useful entry vehicle into
the private antitrust bar.
How?
Career Path to Current Position:
I was a staff attorney at the Federal Trade Commission (Chicago
Regional Office) and a senior trial attorney at the Antitrust Division
(Chicago Field Office) before joining McDermott, Will & Emery.
Suggested Reading About Your Practice Area: BNA Antitrust & Trade Regulation Reporter provides a weekly perspective of what is happening in the antitrust world.
Bar Affiliations and Activities:
Chicago Bar Association; American Bar Association; American
Health Lawyers Association.
Recent Professional Publications:
Antitrust in the Healthcare Field: Meeting the Challenge
(2d ed. AHLA 1998); for a more complete listing of publications,
visit mwe.com
Recent Professional Presentations:
Antitrust in the Healthcare Field (May 2001)--Recent Issues Raised
by Provider Networks; Fundamentals of Health Law( Nov. 2001 and
2002)--Antitrust Issues
Memorable Career Moment:
United States v. Baker Hughes, Inc.: final argument before
Hon. Gerhard Gesell on behalf of Oy Tampella, the acquiring party
defendant in an acquisition of Baker Hughes' assets that was challenged
by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. Judge Gesell
had written the opinion in FTC v. Coca Cola, Inc., upholding the
Government's challenge of the merger and the facts in the Baker
Hughes case were startlingly similar to the facts in the Coca-Cola
case. Judge Gesell was probably the smartest judge before whom I
have appeared.
|