| Ad
Hoc Committee on Billable Hours Model Diet |
|
Model Diet: Recommended Breakdown of 2300 Creditable Hours for LawyersA Model "Diet" of Types of Work for the Apocryphal "Typical" Associate in a Law Firm One of the oft-expressed laments about the billable hours system and, particularly, onerous billable hour requirements is the fact that too heavy a billable hour load has the inevitable effect of crowding out other important non-billable activities, of benefit to the lawyer's firm, the profession, and/or the community. Accordingly, it seems to be a useful exercise to design a proper mix -- for use as a "best practice", or in a firm policy manual -- that ensures a level of billable and non-billable activity to serve not only the interests of an acceptable level of productivity given the firm's reasonable profitability aspirations, but also other important objectives. Some caveats should be noted: 1. This model recognizes that the "typical"
associate -- and therefore the typical annual "diet" -- is apocryphal.
Every year, something unexpected happens that would make consistent
achievement of these targets impossible -- whether it is a five-month
trial, an all-consuming, year-long transaction, a major pro bono
commitment, the drafting of a major, non-billable article or book for
client development purposes, assignment of important and very
time-consuming firm duties, or other developments. This model is
intended as a hypothetical one, achievable on average over the course
of a number of years, but not slavishly in every year. 2. This model also is designed to work within the billable hour system, and so it assumes that the hypothetical associate's client workload is based essentially 100% on billable hours. Obviously, the model is not intended to discourage in any way the ongoing effort to develop alternative pricing models for the profession. 3. The total number of hours reflected in this model -- 2300 hours of billable and non-billable time -- is significant. The model reflects an assumption that law firm associates are willing to work hard, that the profession is demanding, but that it provides great rewards, not only monetarily but also through the challenge and stimulation of work for paying clients as well as the other activities reflected in the model. The total is, at the same time, manageable -- it represents less than 50 hours of recorded, professional time, billable and non-billable per week, allowing for vacation, holidays, etc. We do not view that as an unrealistic burden for incentivized, enthusiastic, hard-working associates who enjoy what they do. Indeed, the allocations suggested for all types of work -- billable and non-billable -- are designed to provide a varied set of challenges and to enhance the psychic rewards of the practice.
4. Needless to say, this "diet" does not address
the issue of part-time work, and there is absolutely no intention to
undermine the importance of the availability of such work schedules by
setting out this full-time "diet". With that introduction, here is a proposed typical "diet": 1. Billable client work -- 1900 hours 2. Pro bono work -- 100 hours 3. Service to the Firm -- 100 hours 4. Client Development -- 75 hours 5. Training and Professional Development -- 75
hours 6. Service to the Profession - 50 hours |
|
Co-Chairs: Jeffrey F. Liss and Anastasia D. Kelly.
Members: Mitchell A. Orpett, Esther F. Lardent, John J.
Curtin, Dennis Curtis,
Janet S. Kloenhamer, Rees W. Morrison, Michael Roster, and Peter
Zeughauser.
Liaisons: Susan Hackett, Arthur G. Greene, Kathleen J. Hopkins,
and Jeff Snell.
Special Contributor: Lisa Smith
ABA Staff: Kathy Morris, Katy Englehart, Veronica Munoz, and
Jill Eckert McCall.