|
|
||||||||||
March 2009 - Volume 7 - Number 5 |
||||||||||
|
Message from the Chair, Karl J. Ege
For many years the Business Law Section has led the way in seeking
improvements to the ethical rules governing the legal profession. The
American Bar Association's Ethics 2000 Commission, chaired by then Delaware
Chief Justice and former Section Chair Norm Veasey (now with Weil
Gotshal & Manges LLP), recommended a number of sweeping changes to the
Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Many of the Commission's
recommendations were adopted by the ABA House of Delegates in 2001. One
recommendation by the Commission that was not then adopted by the House was
providing for "screening" of lawyers who move laterally
between firms. Since then the ABA's Standing Committee on Ethics and
Professional Responsibility, ably led by its current Chair, former Section
Advisor Robert H. Mundheim (Shearman & Sterling LLP), refined
its screening recommendation and the revised proposal was debated before
the House of Delegates at its meeting last month in Boston. I am pleased to
report that the Committee's Report 109, which was co-sponsored by the
Business Law Section and which amends Model Rule 1.10, was approved by the
House and is now part of the Model Rules. Under revised Model Rule 1.10,
screening is now permitted when a lawyer changes the locus of her or his
practice, so that conflicts of interest that apply to the moving lawyer are
not imputed to the lawyers in the successor law firm provided specified
screening procedures are followed. The full text of the Committee's Report
109 can be located at
http://www.abanet.org/cpr/recommendation.pdf. I am delighted with the leadership demonstrated by the Business Law Section in addressing this important issue in today's dynamic and ever-changing legal practice. In addition to Standing Committee Chair Bob Mundheim, a number of our Section's leaders actively participated in the House debate on this important topic, including Lucian T. Pera, a member of the Ethics 2000 Commission (Adams and Reese LLP), Myles V. Lynk (Arizona State University College of Law), Maury B. Poscover (Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP), and Paula E. Boggs (Starbucks Coffee Co.). You can be assured that whenever key ethical issues are before the profession, the Business Law Section has and will continue to be actively involved in encouraging responsible and progressive ethical rules that properly regulate lawyers and protect the interests of our clients. In my report above on the new Ethics Rule, I referred to our distinguished member Bob Mundheim as a former "Section Advisor". This prompted me to share with you some details about the Section's Business Law Advisors program and the unique opportunities it presents to our members. Several years ago, at the urging of then Section Chair Barbara Mayden (then of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC, and now a legal recruiter with Young Mayden LLC), the Section created the Business Law Advisors program to engage in the Section's activities senior lawyers with a long and distinguished career as business law counselors or academics. The program has been an extraordinary success, and has drawn into active participation more than a dozen business law luminaries. Three Advisors are selected each year and each serves for two years. Each Advisor is assigned to one or more Section committees and actively participates in the assigned committee's activities at the Section's Spring Meeting, the ABA Annual Meeting and stand-alone committee meetings. Advisors are encouraged to extend their participation after their formal term has ended, and we are delighted that several have chosen to do so. Currently the Section's Advisors and the committee(s) to which they have been assigned are:
Attendance at the Section's Spring Meeting and the ABA Annual Meeting offers our members a unique opportunity to meet and interact with these distinguished members of our profession. These leading lawyers have embraced the Advisors program and have given their time and talent to make the Section's activities more meaningful and relevant to our members. I urge each of you to consider attending at least one of our Section meetings to enjoy the opportunity to become acquainted with one or more of our Section Advisors. In closing, I am pleased to report that membership in our Section continues to increase steadily notwithstanding the challenges each of us faces as we assist our clients in weathering the current economic turmoil. Our members are finding that now more than ever, the high quality products and services offered by the Business Law Section represent a value proposition that supports continuing membership. Those of us in your Section's leadership are doing our best to make our services even more valuable and meaningful to our members. Please feel free to contact me at kege@perkinscoie.com with your suggestions as to how we can better serve your needs.
Best wishes,
Karl J. Ege Chair, Business Law Section |
|||||||||
Practice PointsNote from the EditoreSource is interested in practice pointers that you want to share with the members of the Business Law Section, and so we are expanding the scope of this section of eSource to include member submitted practice pointers. These member submitted practice pointers will be in addition to featuring interesting and timely programs and materials produced by the Committees of the Business Law Section. Please send your submissions to the eSource editor via email. · · · · ·
All submissions must be through email and must include the author's full contact
information and affiliations. The eSource editor has sole discretion regarding the
decision to publish any member submitted practice pointer. Authors of selected
submissions must sign the ABA's standard copyright release prior to publication.
This program discussed topics such as litigation against future commission
agents, the viability of financial services patents, the cases regarding
credit default swaps and collateralized debt obligations, bankruptcy issues
for futures, derivatives and securities markets, and professional
responsibility issues regarding conflicts and waiver.
This program discussed various perspectives on regulatory structure
initiatives and regulation of large financial conglomerates, hedge funds,
exchanges and clearinghouses, including the role of the Federal Reserve
Board and international issues.
This article considers the decision of Judge Barbara Jones of the Southern
District of New York on November 5, 2008, in VCG Special Opportunities Fund
v. Citibank, N.A., Docket No. 08-CV-01563, finding that Citibank N.A.
(Citibank)the credit protection buyer under a credit default swap
(CDS)was entitled to certain payments from the credit protection
seller, VCG Special Opportunities Master Fund Limited (VCG), and granting
Citibank judgment on the pleadings. The decision reinforces the likelihood
that courts will strictly construe CDS agreements and uphold them as a
matter of law.
This article provides a basic understanding of the mechanics of a credit
default swap (CDS) and touches on several issues that a CDS creates in
bankruptcy and in out-of-court workouts, given that economic rights in
these instruments have been decoupled from contractual rights normally
associated with the underlying debt. A CDS permits parties to hedge
against credit risk by transferring the inherent risk of purchasing a
credit instrument to another party. The rapid growth of the CDS market has
caused many to question the unintended consequences CDSs have, or at least
may have, on financially distressed companies.
This article provides an introduction to European Union data protection
principles and how those principles may come into play during U.S.
government investigations, such as those conducted by the Department of
Justice or the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission. By ignoring or flouting
data protection rights, companies sometimes create new problems while
trying to manage old ones. It therefore is essential, when investigating on
foreign soil, to become familiar with the local data protection landscape.
Ethics CornerWhat's With Screening?
Many in this audience are only somewhat aware of the role of screening in the operation of law firms.
The purpose of this article is to provide some context for what has been going on in the world of
conflicts of interest with respect to screening.
Committee SpotlightTo learn more about or join the committees that contributed to this month's practice points, just click on the committee name below.Section NewsThe Section is Now Accepting Applications for the Business Law Fellows and Ambassadors Program.
The goal of the Business Law Fellows and Ambassadors Program is to increase the participation of young lawyers
and lawyers of color in Section activities. The Section is committed to investing dollars in these individuals who
are expected to participate actively in the substantive work of the Section and to grow into future leadership
positions within the Section. The Program is designed not only to develop future leaders of the Section but also
to enhance the image of the Section among members of the Young Lawyers Division and national bars of color in
order to attract these individuals into Section membership. The Section will select five Fellows and five
Ambassadors and will fund their expenses to participate in Section activities for two years. Applications
are due April 15, 2009. For more information about the program,
click here.
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||