SECTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & REGULATORY PRACTICE
Ombudsman Committee
Appendix A
The Ombudsman
- 1. Definition
The Ombudsman is an independent governmental official who receives complaints against government agencies and officials from aggrieved persons, who investigates, and who, if the complaints are justified, makes recommendations to remedy the complaints.
- 2. Basic Concept
The Ombudsman system is one of the institutions essential to a society
under the Rule of Law, a society in which fundamental rights and human
dignities are respected. Human rights are not protected simply by
constitutions or legislation, by guarantees or speeches, by proclamations
or declarations, but primarily by the availability of remedies. The
Ombudsman system is one of the remedies which seeks to preserve human
rights.
- 3. Reasons for Ombudsman
a). The post-World War II growth of the welfare state. Government grew in
size and extensive powers were given to agencies. Protection is needed
against executive and administrative mistake and abuse of power.
b). The activities of public administration have become so comprehensive
and the power of the bureaucracy so great that the legal status of the
individual needs additional protection.
c). Existing mechanism - courts, legislatures, the executive,
administrative courts, and administrative agencies - are not sufficient to
cope with the grievances of the aggrieved and there is a need for a
supplementary institution.
d). The presence of the Ombudsman has psychological value. His office gives
the citizen confidence that there exists a watchdog for the people who will
hold government accountable.
e).The legislature traditionally concerned with the observance of laws and
rulings by public officials has at the same time extensively delegated
powers to the administrative authorities. The Ombudsman can serve to aid
the legislature in its function of supervising the executive and
administrator.
f). The Ombudsman gives the citizen an expert and impartial agent without
personal cost to the complainant, without time delay, without the tension
of adversary litigation, and without requirement of counsel or the
intervention of those highly placed.
- 4. Types of Action or inaction which Gives Rise to Complaints
1. Injustice
2. Failure to carry out legislative intent
3. Unreasonable delay
4. Administrative error
5. Abuse of discretion
6. Lack of courtesy
7. Simple clerical error
8. Oppression
9. Oversight
10. Negligence
11. Inadequate investigation
12. Unfair policy
13. Partiality
14. Failure to communicate
15. rudeness
16. Maladministration
17. Unfairness
18. Unreasonableness
19. Arbitrariness
20. Arrogance
21. Inefficiency
22. Violation of law or regulations
23. Abuse of authority
24. Discrimination
25. Disability to act
26. Errors, mistakes, carelessness
27. Disagreement with discretionary decisions
28. Inconsistent with general course of an agency's function
29. Mistakes in law or arbitrary in ascertainments of facts
30. Based on irrelevant consideration
31. Unclear or inadequately explained when reason should have been revealed
32. Inefficiently performed
33. All other acts of injustice that frequently the governors inflict upon
the governed, intentionally or unintentionally
b). The Ombudsman may also recommend clarification, amendment, or
initiation of legislation and administrative rules and regulations.
- 5. American Bar Association Resolution
The following Resolution dealing with the establishment of an Ombudsman was
adopted by the American Bar Association at the Midyear Meeting of the House
of Delegates in 1969.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association recommends:
- 1. That state and local governments of the United States should give
consideration to the establishment of an ombudsman authorized to inquire
into administrative action and to make public criticism.
- 2. That each statute or ordinance establishing an ombudsman should contain
the following twelve essentials:
(1) authority of the ombudsman to criticize all agencies, officials,
and public employees except courts and their personnel, legislative bodies
and their personnel, and the chief executive and his personal staff;
(2) independence of the ombudsman from control by any other officer,
except for his responsibility to the legislative body;
(3) appointment by the legislative body or appointment by the executive
with confirmation by the designated proportion of the legislative body,
preferably more than a majority, such as two-thirds;
(4) independence of the ombudsman through a long term, not less than
five years, with freedom from removal except for cause, determined by more
than a majority of the legislative body, such as two-thirds;
(5) a high salary equivalent to that of a designated top officer;
(6) freedom of the ombudsman to employ his own assistants and to
delegate to them, without restrictions of civil service and classification
acts;
(7) freedom of the ombudsman to investigate any act or failure to act
by any agency, official, or public employee;
(8) access of the ombudsman to all public records he finds relevant to
an investigation;
(9) authority to inquire into fairness, correctness of findings,
motivation, adequacy of reasons, efficiency, and procedural propriety of
any action or inaction by any agency, official, or public employee;
(10) discretionary power to determine what complaints to investigate and
to determine what criticisms to make or to publicize;
(11) opportunity for any agency, official, or public employee criticized
by the ombudsman to have advance notice of the criticism and to publish
with the criticism and answering statement;
(12) immunity of the ombudsman and his staff from civil liability on
account of official action.
3. That for the purpose of determining the workability of the ombudsman
idea within the Federal government, the Federal government should
experiment with the establishment of an ombudsman or ombudsmen for a
limited geographical area or areas for a specific agency or agencies or for
a limited phase or limited phases of Federal activity.
4. That establishment of a Federal government-wide ombudsman program should
await findings based upon the experimentation recommended.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Section Administrative Law is authorized
to present the views of the Association and to encourage the establishment
of ombudsmen in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution, by all
necessary and appropriate means.
|  |

ABA and Section Membership information
For additional information on the Section, please contact the section at:
Phone: (202) 662-1528
Fax: (202) 662-1529
E-Mail: adminlaw@abanet.org
ABA Section of Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice
740 15th Street NW
Washington, DC 20005-1022
E-Mail: adminlaw@abanet.org
|
|