American Bar Association Inside Practice
January 2007: Volume 6, Issue 1

Know the Parameters of Mold Litigation

Despite a continuing growth in the number of mold-related lawsuits, this number is unlikely to rise to the level of asbestos. The largest jury verdicts and settlements have involved claims of bad faith on the part of insurers. There are many differences between mold and asbestos litigation. Mold has not been scientifically linked to a clearly mold-cause disease and rarely causes irreversible injury or death. Moreover, mold defendants, who are usually limited to owners and builders, do not have particularly large pockets. In addition, many insurance policies have exclusions for mold, where no such exclusions existed for asbestos.

Ultimately, as owners and builders further appreciate the possible harms associated with mold infestation, they will continue to improve the proactive and reactive measures they take. Faster and more adequate responses to new complaints will substantially reduce any possible damages that a defendant might incur.

More information about the book Toxic Tort Litigation

Excerpted from Toxic Tort Litigation
Edited by D. Alan Rudlin
“Special Cases: Trends in Toxic Tort Mold Litigation” by Tami Lyn Azorsky and Christine Kringer

ABA Section of the Environment, Energy and Resources

Back to January 2007 Inside Practice Index

Previous Issues of Inside Practice